News

Exclusive analysis article with latest market updates, and in-time news feeds.

【SMM Analysis】Windfall or Export Levy? Inside Indonesia's Upcoming Commodities’ Tax
Recent volatility in the Indonesian commodities sector has been driven by mixed signals regarding new fiscal policies. Market participants are currently evaluating the implications of two distinct regulatory mechanisms: a broader windfall tax on bulk commodities like coal, nickel, and a targeted export duty. The conflation of these two policies has generated significant market uncertainty, culminating in a sharp spike in global nickel prices this week. To understand the current market anxiety, which culminated in a sharp spike in global nickel prices this week, it is essential to unpack the timeline of these policy discussions, differentiate the fiscal mechanisms at play, and assess the likelihood of their implementation. Background: From Broad Windfall Deliberations to Targeted Export Tariffs The narrative surrounding new commodity taxes in Indonesia did not emerge overnight; rather, it has evolved through distinct phases of policy signaling. The current policy discourse has evolved in phases. Initial discussions, highlighted by statements from Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs Airlangga Hartarto on Mar 13, 2026, focused on the potential implementation of a windfall tax. This broader fiscal measure was aimed at capturing excess margins from exporters of coal, palm oil, and base metals, such as nickel, gold, and copper during periods of elevated global prices, functioning primarily as a macroeconomic revenue-generation tool. However, the conversation shifted dramatically on March 25, 2026. According to Bloomberg, news broke that Indonesia’s President had officially approved an export tax specifically targeting coal and nickel. This headline acted as an immediate catalyst, sending LME and SHFE nickel prices spiking. The confusion currently gripping the market stems from the conflation of these two distinct policy trajectories: the older, revenue-focused windfall tax concept championed by economic ministers, and the newly approved, strategically focused nickel export tax aimed at forcing further downstream industrialization. Analysis & Understanding: The Precedent of the "Windfall Tax" To accurately gauge the impact of these rumors, it is critical to understand that the concept of a "windfall tax" is not entirely unprecedented in Indonesia's regulatory framework, particularly for bulk commodities. There has actually been a windfall tax structure in place previously, though often masked under the nomenclature of progressive royalties and non-tax state revenues (PNBP). For the coal sector, the government already utilizes a tiered royalty system pegged to the Harga Batubara Acuan (HBA) benchmark. As coal prices escalate into higher brackets, the royalty percentage automatically increases, effectively acting as a windfall capture mechanism. Similarly before, the nickel sector utilizes the Domestic Benchmark Price (HPM) and associated royalty structures to adjust to global price rallies. It is crucial to note that the government has previously experimented with specific windfall profit provisions for downstream products, though the regulatory stance has recently hardened. For instance, under Government Regulation (GR) No. 26/2022, a unique windfall profit incentive was applied to nickel matte: when prices exceeded $21,000 per ton, the royalty rate was actually reduced from the standard 2% to 1%. (Old Version) However, this accommodating policy was explicitly abolished under the recent GR No. 19/2025. The removal of this incentive underscores a definitive shift toward more aggressive state revenue capture. Consequently, the recent "windfall tax" rumors primarily concern further tightening these existing brackets or introducing a supplementary surcharge on operating margins above a specific baseline. (New Version) Conversely, the newly approved nickel export tax serves a different primary function. Therefore, it is completely different than the concept of windfall tax. Rather than merely earning from peak profits, an export duty on semi-processed nickel (like NPI, MHP, FeNi, and Nickel Matte) is a structural tool designed to penalize the export of lower-value products. It is the natural continuation of Indonesia’s downstreaming (hilirisasi) agenda, intended to force producers to build stainless steel and EV battery precursor plants domestically in Indonesia, rather than shipping intermediate goods to other countries. While a windfall tax fluctuates with market prices, an export tax acts as a permanent structural cost added to the global supply chain. Conclusion: Imminent Implementation Amidst Ongoing Deliberations Despite definitive headlines regarding executive approval and the targeted April 1, 2026 implementation date, the exact implementation details are currently under review by the relevant ministries. Currently, specific details, including exactly how the proposed 5%, 8%, and 11% tiers might translate from coal to specific nickel material classifications (e.g., NPI, MHP, and high-grade matte), must be urgently finalized ahead of the April deadline. The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM), the Ministry of Finance, and the Coordinating Ministry for Maritime and Investment Affairs are working to balance state revenue optimization with the need to maintain the global cost-competitiveness of domestic smelters. This deliberative phase should not be interpreted as a policy reversal. According to SMM's understanding and industry checks, the implementation of these fiscal measures is highly probable. While the exact rollout of tariffs may be structured to mitigate immediate operational shocks to the domestic smelting sector, the fundamental policy direction indicates that the era of tariff-free exports for intermediate nickel products might decisively coming to an end.
Mar 27, 2026 10:08
【SMM Analysis】Windfall or Export Levy? Inside Indonesia's Upcoming Commodities’ Tax
【SMM Analysis】Navigating the Choke Point: How Middle Eastern Geopolitics are Reshaping Global Aluminum Scrap Flows
【SMM Analysis】Navigating the Choke Point: How Middle Eastern Geopolitics are Reshaping Global Aluminum Scrap Flows
【SMM Scrap Aluminium Market Analysis】Navigating the Choke Point: How Middle Eastern Geopolitics are Rewiring Global Aluminum Scrap Flows I. Introduction: The Macroeconomic Catalyst The global secondary aluminum market is currently navigating a severe logistical gauntlet. While physical smelting and processing facilities across the Middle East are facing their own localized pressures, the maritime arteries connecting the region to the rest of the world are fundamentally compromised. With vessel traffic heavily restricted through traditional waterways like the Red Sea, carriers are executing widespread, mandatory rerouting around the Cape of Good Hope. This geographical detour has introduced hard, quantifiable friction into global trade flows. Transit times from Europe and the Middle East to major Asian main ports have stretched by an additional 12 to 14 days. Consequently, freight costs per container have also reported increases by up to 60-70%. Beyond the immediate ticket price of shipping, this delay translates to millions of dollars in working capital abruptly tied up in floating inventory, severely squeezing liquidity for global traders. To understand the future of secondary aluminum pricing and availability, the market must look at how this disruption cascades across the supply chain. The logistical fallout has created a massive supply shock that is permanently altering working capital dynamics and regional pricing. This structural shift can be traced from Western supply hubs, through the starved processing centers in Southeast Asia, and ultimately to the end-user markets in China and Other Asia, where tightened margins are reshaping the landscape of global scrap procurement. II. The Middle East: The Epicenter of the Bottleneck The Middle East serves as a critical reservoir of scrap aluminum, and current export metrics underscore the massive scale of the material caught in this logistical bottleneck. The United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia stand as the undisputed dominant suppliers in the region. Recent mirrored customs data shows the UAE exporting upwards of 309,000 metric tons (MT) in 2025, while Saudi Arabia commands a similar volume, exporting over 277,000 MT in 2024 and up to 260,000 MT by October 2025. Historically, a massive majority of this tonnage has been earmarked for Asian buyers, flowing seamlessly through previously unencumbered maritime routes. India and Korea respectively have been the top 2 export destinations for both the UAE and Saudi Arabia since 2020, with both Asian destinations encompassing a total of 81% for Saudi Arabia’s (2020-2024) and 74% for the UAE’s (2020-2025) total exports of scrap aluminum. Mid-tier exporters further supplement this outward flow. Nations such as Israel (exporting roughly 88,000 to 95,000 MT annually) and Kuwait (over 41,000 to 44,000 MT), alongside consistent volumes from Jordan, Bahrain, and Iran, collectively push significant supplementary tonnage into the global market. Similar to Saudi Arabia and the UAE’s situation, South Asia and South Korea remains the most affected: between the years 2020 to 2025, India, Pakistan and South Korea import 60% of the Middle Eastern mid-tier exporters’ scrap aluminum. However, getting this material onto the water, especially through the Strait of Hormuz has become increasingly complex, expensive and operationally untenable. In response to the waterway risks, localized workarounds are emerging: suppliers are increasingly bypassing traditional choke points by trucking upstream material overland to alternative, safer ports before loading it onto eastbound vessels. Meanwhile, traditional transit bridges are feeling the strain. Typical scrap flows rely on the Red Sea in the Middle East to ship scrap between Europe and Asia, and this traditional trade route is feeling the strain from the current war in the Middle East. Although the Houthis in Yemen have not enforced shipment closures through the Red Sea, the threat of them doing so in extension of Iran’s closure of the Straits of Hormuz is enough to force certain companies and insurance policies off of Middle Eastern shipment routes, and to reroute around Africa and the Cape of Good Hope. This leads to partial extensions of freight times for up to 12-14 days, and some 60% to 70% surge in per container shipment costs between Europe and Asia. The extended transit time is not just a scheduling issue; it translates to millions of dollars in working capital abruptly tied up in floating inventory. As outward flows from the Middle East and Europe slow down under these compounding pressures, the knock-on effect creates an immediate feedstock starvation for the processing hubs waiting further East. III. Asia: The Primary Impact Zone While the logistical friction originates in the West, the financial and operational shockwaves are most acutely felt in the "Other Asia" region, specifically within the Indian and South Korean markets. These nations serve as the primary off-takers for Middle Eastern scrap, and the sudden disruption to their traditional supply lines has triggered a rapid repricing of the market. India: Demand Absorbing the Freight Shock India represents the most immediate example of a market forced to reconcile surging logistics costs with robust domestic demand. As a direct result of the freight spike and logistical difficulties, CIF India prices for key imported grades from Europe like Tense and Taint/Tabor have seen approximately $50 USD per metric ton price hikes over the past week. Critically, this cost burden is not being borne by the sellers alone. Analysis of the current buyer/seller split suggests that recent increases in Indian domestic demand for scrap are providing significant upward pressure on prices. This has allowed a portion of the inflated freight costs to be absorbed by Indian buyers who are prioritizing material security over margin preservation. However, this absorption is not infinite; the $50 USD spike is beginning to significantly tighten margins for local secondary producers, raising concerns about how long this price elasticity can be maintained if transit delays persist. Korea and Japan: Strategic Stockpiling and Regional Procurement In East Asia, the response to the Middle Eastern bottleneck has been characterized by strategic stockpiling and a pivot toward Southeast Asian (SEA) supply. As both Japan and South Korea commonly purchase scrap and secondary products (like ADC12) from the Middle Eastern region, there is a sudden need to replace material sources that have been disrupted directly by the US/Israel-Iran conflict. Primary market intelligence from Southeast and East Asia has seen Japanese (and to a smaller extent, Korean and Indian) players engaging in large-scale procurement of secondary products from Southeast Asia at significant prices. SMM’s data reveals that over the first and second weeks of the Middle Eastern conflict, ADC12 CIF Japan prices have seen significant rises, reaching highs at 3350-60 USD/mt between the 11 th to 17 th of March 2026. This coincides with large amounts of stock clearance and/or signing of procurement deals that extend up till mid-April to early-May. These purchases are occurring at high price points, driven by robust Japanese demand that is effectively outbidding local processors. This "procurement blitz" is rapidly depleting regional liquidity, leaving Southeast Asian hubs starved of the very feedstock they traditionally rely on to serve their own domestic industries. Thailand local ADC12 prices have been observed to be lagging behind FOB prices by 100-200USD/mt, creating a supply starvation for local downstream needs. As of the 26 th of March, market intelligence has revealed a possible second wave of procurement from East Asian nations in Southeast Asia due to increasing worries over the extended war. Prices for ADC12 FOB Thailand and Malaysia deals have been stabilizing around the 3200-3230 USD/t mark as demand slowly creeps back up for both local and foreign demands. Thailand local and FOB ADC12 prices have just closed the gap to be roughly equal, and deals can be observed both within Thailand and exporting towards East and South Asian markets. IV. China: The Regional Exception While the rest of Asia grapples with supply starvation and skyrocketing premiums, China remains a notable outlier in the current crisis. Historically, China’s secondary aluminum sector has maintained a lower direct reliance on Middle Eastern scrap compared to its neighbors in South and East Asia, providing an initial layer of insulation. However, the primary reason for China’s relative stability is internal: a combination of sluggish domestic demand and historically high inventory levels. As of late March 2026, China’s social aluminum inventories have reached a five-year high, effectively acting as a massive buffer against global supply shocks. Furthermore, the LME-SHFE arbitrage window has remained largely unfavorable for primary imports, keeping Chinese buyers on the sidelines. On the secondary side, the lack of specificity and details regarding the reverse invoicing policy have generally led to the secondary aluminum market shifting towards a more passive stance. Downstream demand for secondary aluminum has pivoted towards immediate and small amounts of material to reduce risks associated with reverse invoicing, leading to weak demand within China. While higher global freight costs have increased the baseline cost for any incoming material, the lack of domestic "buy-side" pressure means that China has avoided the aggressive price spikes seen in India, Southeast Asia and Japan. For now, the Chinese market is a spectator to the volatility, characterized more by weak spot fundamentals and unclear policy than by the procurement panic gripping the rest of the continent. V. Strategic Outlook: The New Reality of Trade The current landscape suggests that the global aluminum scrap market is moving toward a "new normal" characterized by higher logistical floors and reduced liquidity. Increasing political and institutional instability in Iran and the wider Middle East creates ever-increasing tension and uncertainty for global trade through the Middle East. The transition from the Middle East to the Cape of Good Hope could possibly no longer be a temporary detour but a structural shift that traders must eventually consider as a safer alternative. In extension to the Middle Eastern conflict, the endurance of the "procurement blitz" in East Asia will serve as a bellwether for the long-term stability of scrap flows in Asia. If the inventory buffer in Southeast Asia remains depleted by aggressive Japanese and Korean bidding, the upward price pressure on Indian buyers will likely move from a temporary spike to a permanent baseline. Local downstream industries from Thailand and Malaysia might also find it hard in the medium-long term to cope with constantly spiking ADC12 prices and competition from East and South Asia. Ultimately, the traditional metrics of secondary aluminum pricing, such as the LME-SHFE spread or local collection rates, are being overshadowed by the premium on logistical certainty. As available aluminum scrap becomes increasingly scarce due to supply disruptions in the Middle East and increased costs for material from Europe, this creates price-side pressure for both producers and downstream industries across Asia. This leads to a zero-sum environment in which increasing costs are either burdened by buyers through increasing prices, heightened competition and larger local-export arbitrages that put pressure on local downstream industries, or burdened by producers and traders through shrinking margins and intense inter-producer competition. As the market adapts to this fragmented landscape, the value proposition of a successful trader is fundamentally shifting: it is no longer defined solely by the ability to source metal, but by the ability to guarantee its arrival through an increasingly volatile and high-risk global supply chain.
Mar 27, 2026 09:04
[SMM Analysis] 2026 Sodium-Ion Battery Competitive Landscape: Na‑ion Pioneers vs Lithium Battery Giants
[SMM Analysis] 2026 Sodium-Ion Battery Competitive Landscape: Na‑ion Pioneers vs Lithium Battery Giants
In 2026, the correction in lithium carbonate prices drove up lithium battery production costs. Coupled with uncertainties in lithium resources supply, cost pressure across the new energy industry became increasingly prominent. Leveraging the advantages of abundant sodium resources, balanced distribution, and controllable costs, sodium-ion batteries have leapt from being a “backup option” for lithium batteries to a key direction for industry breakthrough...
Mar 20, 2026 15:00
What Could Change if Middle East Aluminum Trade Reroutes—and Supply Becomes Substitutable
Strait of Hormuz disruptions and Iran tensions are driving up aluminum prices and premiums. Aluminium Bahrain and Qatalum have cut output, while feedstock is tight. Rerouting via Port of Sohar or Saudi ports raises costs and delays. Buyers are turning to China, India, Russia, Canada, and scrap to offset risk. Prolonged disruption could reduce Middle East market share and reprice it as higher-risk supply.
Mar 24, 2026 17:22
China’s Silver Ingot Imports Hit Multi-Year High in February 2026, Reshaping Supply-Demand Landscape
The latest customs data showed that in February 2026, China’s imports of unwrought silver ingots with a purity of no less than 99.99% reached 206.76 mt, up 499% MoM and surging 5,910% YoY to a multi-year high. The rare opening of the import window drove significant changes in the supply-demand pattern of the domestic silver ingot market.
Mar 25, 2026 17:51

Latest News

[SMM Analysis] Molybdenum Market: Oscillating Upward, Supported by Overseas Disturbances
[SMM Analysis] Molybdenum Market: Oscillating Upward, Supported by Overseas Disturbances
SMM Report, February 12 Since January, the domestic molybdenum market in China has seen a slight rebound. At the beginning of January, domestic mines shipped goods intensively. Against the backdrop of low industry inventories, the focus of mine auction prices moved upward, driving a mild rise in market prices early in the month. However, the price increase was constrained by poor profitability of downstream steel mills and the weak import molybdenum oxide market in the middle of the month.
Dec 30, 2025 16:25
Public Inquiry and Comparative Tender Announcement for Molybdenum Bars of Pangang Group Changcheng Special Steel Company in December 2025
Dec 5, 2025 11:06
Average Cost and Profit of Ferromolybdenum Industry, 2025.10.6-2025.10.10
October 6–10, 2025 This week, the average cost in the ferromolybdenum industry was 285,800 yuan/mt, with an average industry loss of -8,330 yuan/mt and an average industry profit margin of -2.95%.
Dec 2, 2025 16:46
Steel Mills Buy the Dip, Ferromolybdenum Trading Volume Rises but Prices Remain Weak [SMM Molybdenum Daily Review]
[Mo Daily Review: Steel mills buy the dip, ferro molybdenum trading volume increases while prices weaken] SMM November 26 news: This week, the molybdenum market was mainly under pressure, spot transaction prices of molybdenum concentrate were weak, and steel tenders for ferro molybdenum were relatively concentrated. However, under the condition of market divergence, the price center of steel tenders moved down significantly.
Nov 26, 2025 16:53
Panchangte Molybdenum Bar Open Inquiry and Comparative Tender for December 2025 Procurement
Nov 20, 2025 16:34
Molybdenum Mine Transaction Prices Turn Lower, Molybdenum Market Prices Ease [SMM Molybdenum Daily Review]
[SMM Molybdenum Daily Review: Molybdenum Ore Transaction Prices Turn Lower, Molybdenum Market Prices Soften] SMM November 19: This week, the molybdenum market retreated after a rapid rise. On Monday, a mining company in Inner Mongolia sold products through bidding, with the transaction price for 45% molybdenum concentrate rising to 3,800 yuan/mtu. This drove the spot order transaction center up by about 50 yuan/mtu to around 3,760 yuan/mtu. However, downstream ferromolybdenum plants faced severe price inversions and had limited capacity to absorb high-priced molybdenum concentrate.
Nov 19, 2025 17:01
Molybdenum Market Plummets, Ferromolybdenum Steel Tender Price Falls Below 230,000 yuan/mt [SMM Molybdenum Daily Review]
[SMM Molybdenum Daily Review: Molybdenum Market Plummets, Ferromolybdenum Tender Prices Fall Below 230,000 yuan/mt] SMM November 12 News: This week, the domestic molybdenum market accelerated its decline, with the entire molybdenum industry chain entering a downward trend. International molybdenum oxide, along with the domestic molybdenum raw material market, experienced significant drops. Stainless steel market prices were under pressure, and industry profits urgently needed recovery, leading to tender activities primarily focused on driving down prices. Mainstream steel mills continued to lower tender prices, and the transaction center for ferromolybdenum had already shifted down to around 230,000 yuan/mt.
Nov 12, 2025 16:09
Panchangte Molybdenum Bar Open Inquiry and Comparison Procurement Tender for October 2025
Oct 23, 2025 14:04
August 15 Transaction Summary of Molybdenum Concentrate at a Molybdenum Mine in Henan [SMM Molybdenum Steel Tender Information]
[Molybdenum Concentrate Bidding Transaction Information] According to SMM, on October 15, a large molybdenum enterprise in Luoyang sold molybdenum concentrate through bidding, with 540 mt of over 45% molybdenum concentrate and 270 mt of 50% molybdenum concentrate transacted.
Oct 15, 2025 15:42
Transaction Results of Molybdenum Concentrate Auction on October 13 [SMM Molybdenum Concentrate Transaction Results]
[ Molybdenum Concentrate Bidding Transaction Information ] On October 13, two domestic molybdenum concentrate mines conducted auctions for shipments, and the transaction price moved higher.
Oct 14, 2025 09:09
Downstream Pre-Holiday Restocking Nears Completion, Molybdenum Market Continues to Decline [SMM Molybdenum Weekly Review]
[SMM Molybdenum Weekly Review: Downstream Pre-Holiday Restocking Nears Completion, Molybdenum Market Continues to Decline] Overall, domestic molybdenum concentrate mines have yet to release supplies in bulk, limiting the increase in market circulation. However, due to falling prices of downstream products such as ferromolybdenum and weak performance in the international molybdenum market, transaction prices have trended downward. Under significant cost pressure, some traders are offloading ferromolybdenum at low prices to liquidate assets. With pessimistic market sentiment, ferromolybdenum producers are relatively passive, while steel mills primarily focus on bargain-down purchasing. The molybdenum market is expected to remain weak and consolidate before the holiday. Post-holiday, attention should be paid to the supply releases from mainstream mines and the restocking pace of downstream steel mills.
Sep 26, 2025 16:42
Transaction Details of Molybdenum Concentrate Ore Auction from September 23 to September 24 [SMM Molybdenum Concentrate Transaction Information]
[Tender Transaction Information for Molybdenum Concentrate] A mine in Luanchuan, Henan, tendered the sale of two batches of molybdenum concentrate, totaling 66 mt of 45-50% molybdenum concentrate, with a base price of 4,430 yuan/mtu (Cu ≤0.5%, P ≤0.03%). The transaction price achieved through bidding was 4,430 yuan/mtu.
Sep 24, 2025 13:20
Molybdenum Concentrate Prices Eased, Molybdenum Market Operated Under Pressure During the Week [SMM Molybdenum Weekly Review]
[SMM Molybdenum Weekly: Molybdenum Concentrate Prices Eased and the Molybdenum Market Operated Under Pressure This Week] This week, the domestic molybdenum concentrate market operated under pressure. The news of production resumptions at a mine in Inner Mongolia, coupled with the bidding price at a mine in Henan being lower than expected, heightened risk aversion among some suppliers. Spot order shipments of molybdenum concentrate increased, and the transaction center of molybdenum concentrate shifted downward.
Sep 12, 2025 14:33
Average Cost and Profit of the Ferromolybdenum Industry from September 8, 2025 to September 12, 2025
September 8-12, 2025 This week, the average cost in the ferromolybdenum industry was 296,600 yuan/mt, with an average industry loss of 2,935 yuan/mt and an average industry profit margin of -1%. ......
Sep 12, 2025 13:31
【SMM Analysis】Windfall or Export Levy? Inside Indonesia's Upcoming Commodities’ Tax
【SMM Analysis】Windfall or Export Levy? Inside Indonesia's Upcoming Commodities’ Tax
Recent volatility in the Indonesian commodities sector has been driven by mixed signals regarding new fiscal policies. Market participants are currently evaluating the implications of two distinct regulatory mechanisms: a broader windfall tax on bulk commodities like coal, nickel, and a targeted export duty. The conflation of these two policies has generated significant market uncertainty, culminating in a sharp spike in global nickel prices this week. To understand the current market anxiety, which culminated in a sharp spike in global nickel prices this week, it is essential to unpack the timeline of these policy discussions, differentiate the fiscal mechanisms at play, and assess the likelihood of their implementation. Background: From Broad Windfall Deliberations to Targeted Export Tariffs The narrative surrounding new commodity taxes in Indonesia did not emerge overnight; rather, it has evolved through distinct phases of policy signaling. The current policy discourse has evolved in phases. Initial discussions, highlighted by statements from Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs Airlangga Hartarto on Mar 13, 2026, focused on the potential implementation of a windfall tax. This broader fiscal measure was aimed at capturing excess margins from exporters of coal, palm oil, and base metals, such as nickel, gold, and copper during periods of elevated global prices, functioning primarily as a macroeconomic revenue-generation tool. However, the conversation shifted dramatically on March 25, 2026. According to Bloomberg, news broke that Indonesia’s President had officially approved an export tax specifically targeting coal and nickel. This headline acted as an immediate catalyst, sending LME and SHFE nickel prices spiking. The confusion currently gripping the market stems from the conflation of these two distinct policy trajectories: the older, revenue-focused windfall tax concept championed by economic ministers, and the newly approved, strategically focused nickel export tax aimed at forcing further downstream industrialization. Analysis & Understanding: The Precedent of the "Windfall Tax" To accurately gauge the impact of these rumors, it is critical to understand that the concept of a "windfall tax" is not entirely unprecedented in Indonesia's regulatory framework, particularly for bulk commodities. There has actually been a windfall tax structure in place previously, though often masked under the nomenclature of progressive royalties and non-tax state revenues (PNBP). For the coal sector, the government already utilizes a tiered royalty system pegged to the Harga Batubara Acuan (HBA) benchmark. As coal prices escalate into higher brackets, the royalty percentage automatically increases, effectively acting as a windfall capture mechanism. Similarly before, the nickel sector utilizes the Domestic Benchmark Price (HPM) and associated royalty structures to adjust to global price rallies. It is crucial to note that the government has previously experimented with specific windfall profit provisions for downstream products, though the regulatory stance has recently hardened. For instance, under Government Regulation (GR) No. 26/2022, a unique windfall profit incentive was applied to nickel matte: when prices exceeded $21,000 per ton, the royalty rate was actually reduced from the standard 2% to 1%. (Old Version) However, this accommodating policy was explicitly abolished under the recent GR No. 19/2025. The removal of this incentive underscores a definitive shift toward more aggressive state revenue capture. Consequently, the recent "windfall tax" rumors primarily concern further tightening these existing brackets or introducing a supplementary surcharge on operating margins above a specific baseline. (New Version) Conversely, the newly approved nickel export tax serves a different primary function. Therefore, it is completely different than the concept of windfall tax. Rather than merely earning from peak profits, an export duty on semi-processed nickel (like NPI, MHP, FeNi, and Nickel Matte) is a structural tool designed to penalize the export of lower-value products. It is the natural continuation of Indonesia’s downstreaming (hilirisasi) agenda, intended to force producers to build stainless steel and EV battery precursor plants domestically in Indonesia, rather than shipping intermediate goods to other countries. While a windfall tax fluctuates with market prices, an export tax acts as a permanent structural cost added to the global supply chain. Conclusion: Imminent Implementation Amidst Ongoing Deliberations Despite definitive headlines regarding executive approval and the targeted April 1, 2026 implementation date, the exact implementation details are currently under review by the relevant ministries. Currently, specific details, including exactly how the proposed 5%, 8%, and 11% tiers might translate from coal to specific nickel material classifications (e.g., NPI, MHP, and high-grade matte), must be urgently finalized ahead of the April deadline. The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM), the Ministry of Finance, and the Coordinating Ministry for Maritime and Investment Affairs are working to balance state revenue optimization with the need to maintain the global cost-competitiveness of domestic smelters. This deliberative phase should not be interpreted as a policy reversal. According to SMM's understanding and industry checks, the implementation of these fiscal measures is highly probable. While the exact rollout of tariffs may be structured to mitigate immediate operational shocks to the domestic smelting sector, the fundamental policy direction indicates that the era of tariff-free exports for intermediate nickel products might decisively coming to an end.
Mar 27, 2026 10:08
[SMM Analysis] Chinese Tungsten Market Cools While Overseas Prices Sustain Gains – Long-Term Outlook Remains Bullish
[SMM Analysis] Chinese Tungsten Market Cools While Overseas Prices Sustain Gains – Long-Term Outlook Remains Bullish
Mar 27, 2026 18:37
【SMM Analysis】Navigating the Choke Point: How Middle Eastern Geopolitics are Reshaping Global Aluminum Scrap Flows
【SMM Analysis】Navigating the Choke Point: How Middle Eastern Geopolitics are Reshaping Global Aluminum Scrap Flows
Mar 27, 2026 09:04
Gold has been pummeled. 3 reasons why it may rebound
Gold has been pummeled. 3 reasons why it may rebound
10 hours ago
[SMM Analysis] 2026 Sodium-Ion Battery Competitive Landscape: Na‑ion Pioneers vs Lithium Battery Giants
[SMM Analysis] 2026 Sodium-Ion Battery Competitive Landscape: Na‑ion Pioneers vs Lithium Battery Giants
Mar 20, 2026 15:00
What Could Change if Middle East Aluminum Trade Reroutes—and Supply Becomes Substitutable
What Could Change if Middle East Aluminum Trade Reroutes—and Supply Becomes Substitutable
Mar 24, 2026 17:22
China’s Silver Ingot Imports Hit Multi-Year High in February 2026, Reshaping Supply-Demand Landscape
China’s Silver Ingot Imports Hit Multi-Year High in February 2026, Reshaping Supply-Demand Landscape
Mar 25, 2026 17:51
Latest News
Overseas Molybdenum Market Rises Along with Increased Stocking Demand from Domestic Steel Mills, Molybdenum Market Advances [SMM Molybdenum Daily Review]
Feb 4, 2026 17:49
Public Inquiry and Comparative Tender for Molybdenum Bars of Pangang Group Changcheng Special Steel Company in January 2026
Jan 13, 2026 10:29
Post-Holiday Molybdenum Ore Rebounds, Ferromolybdenum Tender Center Rises [SMM Molybdenum Daily Review]
Jan 5, 2026 17:43
[SMM Analysis] Molybdenum Market: Oscillating Upward, Supported by Overseas Disturbances
[SMM Analysis] Molybdenum Market: Oscillating Upward, Supported by Overseas Disturbances
Dec 30, 2025 16:25
Public Inquiry and Comparative Tender Announcement for Molybdenum Bars of Pangang Group Changcheng Special Steel Company in December 2025
Dec 5, 2025 11:06
Average Cost and Profit of Ferromolybdenum Industry, 2025.10.6-2025.10.10
Dec 2, 2025 16:46
Steel Mills Buy the Dip, Ferromolybdenum Trading Volume Rises but Prices Remain Weak [SMM Molybdenum Daily Review]
Nov 26, 2025 16:53
Panchangte Molybdenum Bar Open Inquiry and Comparative Tender for December 2025 Procurement
Nov 20, 2025 16:34
Molybdenum Mine Transaction Prices Turn Lower, Molybdenum Market Prices Ease [SMM Molybdenum Daily Review]
Nov 19, 2025 17:01
Molybdenum Market Plummets, Ferromolybdenum Steel Tender Price Falls Below 230,000 yuan/mt [SMM Molybdenum Daily Review]
Nov 12, 2025 16:09
Ferromolybdenum Price Falls Below 260,000, Mines Hold Back from Selling as Market Competition Intensifies [SMM Molybdenum Daily Review]
Nov 4, 2025 16:33
Weak Demand Coupled with Industry Losses: Ferromolybdenum Operating Rate Hit a Yearly Low in October
Oct 31, 2025 14:34
Weak Demand from Steel Mills Weighs on Molybdenum Market [SMM Molybdenum Daily Review]
Oct 27, 2025 17:03
Panchangte Molybdenum Bar Open Inquiry and Comparison Procurement Tender for October 2025
Oct 23, 2025 14:04
August 15 Transaction Summary of Molybdenum Concentrate at a Molybdenum Mine in Henan [SMM Molybdenum Steel Tender Information]
Oct 15, 2025 15:42
Transaction Results of Molybdenum Concentrate Auction on October 13 [SMM Molybdenum Concentrate Transaction Results]
Oct 14, 2025 09:09
Downstream Pre-Holiday Restocking Nears Completion, Molybdenum Market Continues to Decline [SMM Molybdenum Weekly Review]
Sep 26, 2025 16:42
Transaction Details of Molybdenum Concentrate Ore Auction from September 23 to September 24 [SMM Molybdenum Concentrate Transaction Information]
Sep 24, 2025 13:20
Molybdenum Concentrate Prices Eased, Molybdenum Market Operated Under Pressure During the Week [SMM Molybdenum Weekly Review]
Sep 12, 2025 14:33
Average Cost and Profit of the Ferromolybdenum Industry from September 8, 2025 to September 12, 2025
Sep 12, 2025 13:31