Tesla’s 4680 battery likely to enter mass production. Will the lithium battery industry face reshuffle?

Published: Nov 16, 2021 16:20

Save

Tesla unveiled its 4680 battery during its Battery Day in September 2020, which is a cylindrical battery with a diameter of 46mm and a height of 80mm.

SHANGHAI, Nov 16 (SMM) - Tesla unveiled its 4680 battery during its Battery Day in September 2020, which is a cylindrical battery with a diameter of 46mm and a height of 80mm. Tesla expects that its 4680 battery will have five times more capacity, 16% more driving range and 14% lower costs than the 2170 battery. At present, domestic car companies mainly use prismatic battery. Only Tesla, Daimler, Nissan, Renault, Volkswagen and Hyundai use cylindrical pouch power batteries on a large scale. However, it takes time for car companies to change their battery types. With reference to the speed at which the 2170 battery replaces the 18650 battery, and assuming that the 2170 battery is still the mainstream battery in 2022, it will be gradually replaced by the 4680 battery by 2023 and fully replaced by 2024.

Bigger size, and higher battery capacity due to the use of high nickel ternary cathode materials. The 4680 battery has 5 times more battery capacity than the 2170 battery (not a 5 times increase in energy density), and the increase in battery capacity will also lead to a 16% increase in driving range.

"Tabless” structure allows thermal runaway to be effectively controlled. In terms of heat dissipation, the advantages of cylindrical battery cells are that the capacity of a single unit is low, and the heat release of a single electrical runaway is not easy to spread. Besides, the arc-shaped surface suppresses the heat transfer between the batteries to a certain extent. The cylindrical battery cell itself has a certain threshold for thermal runaway. There is more room for fault tolerance in the module part.

Fewer battery cells and higher space utilisation rate. The cost reduction is mainly due to the fact that the 2170 cylindrical power battery requires 4,400 cells, while the 4680 battery only needs 950 cells, which means higher space utilisation rate and higher assembly efficiency. And compared to the 2170 battery, the 4680 battery reduces the amount of raw materials that do not provide energy density, such as battery separators and steel shells, so as to reduce the costs.

battery

Data Source Statement: Except for publicly available information, all other data are processed by SMM based on publicly available information, market communication, and relying on SMM's internal database model. They are for reference only and do not constitute decision-making recommendations.

For any inquiries or for more information, please contact: lemonzhao@smm.cn

For more information on how to access our research reports, please contact:service.en@smm.cn

Related News

7 hours ago

[SMM Analysis] Portugal Cancels Construction of Integrated Lithium Mining and Processing Industry

7 hours ago

12 hours ago

[SMM Flash] SADC Urged to Shift from Raw Mineral Exports to Processing, Zimbabwe's Lithium Ban Cited as Model

UN Economic Commission for Africa executive secretary Claver Gatete has called on the Southern African Development Community (SADC) to move from raw mineral exports toward local processing and value addition, calling the region a testing ground for Africa's broader mineral strategy. Demand for critical energy transition minerals including lithium could more than triple by 2030 under net-zero scenarios, with Africa holding about 30% of global reserves but just 1% of lithium output, the smallest share among minerals cited. Zimbabwe was named SADC's primary lithium resource holder, alongside the DRC (cobalt), South Africa (platinum, manganese) and Zambia (copper), with Gatete pointing to Zimbabwe's unprocessed lithium export ban as a policy model for the region. Minerals contribute about 10% of SADC's GDP, 25% of exports and 20% of government revenues, but only 7% of direct employment. SMM View: Gatete's remarks lend regional policy weight to Zimbabwe's ongoing beneficiation push, reinforcing the rationale behind its concentrate export ban as domestic sulfate capacity comes online.

12 hours ago

13 hours ago

Sinomine's Bikita Lithium Sulfate Plant Begins Construction, Targets 2027 Completion Amid Zimbabwe's Export Ban Push

Sinomine Resource Group's Zimbabwe unit, Masingo Lithium Technology, has obtained EIA approval for its 100,000 t/y lithium sulfate plant at Bikita, moving the project into full construction with contractors China Railway No. 9 Group and Shandong Dadi now on site. Completion is targeted for mid-2027. The clearance formalizes a plan first disclosed in September 2024 and reaffirmed via Sinomine's RMB 5.2 billion ($764 million) fundraising in May 2026, rather than signaling new capital commitment. Bikita becomes Zimbabwe's third Chinese-backed lithium sulfate project, joining Huayou's 50,000 t/y Arcadia plant commissioned July 2026, running near 60% of capacity as of late July and Yahua's Kamativi facility construction started February 2026, capacity undisclosed. Combined announced capacity across all three approaches 200,000+ t/y once complete, ahead of Zimbabwe's January 2027 concentrate export ban. SMM View: Arcadia's slower than nameplate ramp is the key benchmark here if Bikita follows a similar curve at double the capacity, full-rate output likely slips into 2028 despite a mid-2027 completion date. With all three plants now past groundbreaking, Zimbabwe's beneficiation push has shifted from policy to physical build out, the next signal to watch is how strictly the export ban is enforced against each plant's actual commissioning timeline, not just its announced one.

13 hours ago