300+Ah Cell S-D Situation

게시됨: May 20, 2024 18:49
출처: SMM
In the booming year of 2022 for ESS, HITHIUM's launch of 300Ah cells has sparked widespread market discussion. Opinions vary on the capacity of the next generation of energy storage cells, with debates on who can go beyond 280Ah to lead the market for the next generation of standard ESS cells. Major cell manufacturers are developing different products in the 300-350Ah range, and some companies are ambitiously developing cells over 500Ah.

In the booming year of 2022 for ESS, HITHIUM's launch of 300Ah cells has sparked widespread market discussion. Opinions vary on the capacity of the next generation of energy storage cells, with debates on who can go beyond 280Ah to lead the market for the next generation of standard ESS cells. Major cell manufacturers are developing different products in the 300-350Ah range, and some companies are ambitiously developing cells over 500Ah. One year on, have the 300+ new products become mainstream? Let's see how the market responds.

300+ cells: Accelerated production line transitions and notable regional preferences

From a production capacity perspective, several leading cell manufacturers are rapidly releasing 300+Ah cell capacity. In particular, major manufacturers such as CATL, REPT, CALB and Greatpoweri are leading the way in expanding their production capacity. Some manufacturers have already exceeded 10GWh of 300+ cell production capacity.

According to SMM statistics, the supply rate of 300+Ah cells has reached almost 30% of the total market in terms of production capacity.

In terms of shipments, the proportion of 300+Ah cells shipped in March reached 35%.

SMM's analysis of the shipments and geographical distribution of different ESS cells, specifically the 306Ah and 314Ah models, indicates that downstream integrator customers in different regions have distinct preferences for these cells.

Chinese Market: Preference for 314Ah, with the fastest switching speed downstream. The choice and switching of cell models in the Chinese market are mainly due to the following reasons:

1. Cost-driven: The low profitability of energy storage projects leads to a cost-sensitive market that quickly selects products. Integrators and owners choose the 314Ah cells due to their low integration costs.

2. Flexible certification cycle: Project bidding and certification can be carried out simultaneously. For some projects, it is sufficient to pass the new national standard certification at the time of grid connection, significantly reducing the waiting time for certification.

3. State-owned enterprises (SOEs) leading the market: A large number of Chinese SOE integrators are spearheading the adoption of 314Ah cells, accelerating the transition to mainstream market products.

European Market:

Safety is the most important, 306Ah selected but Mostly for Strategy Agreements, Leading Integrators Start Procuring from CATL. Many major European integrators, including Wartsila, are currently opting for 306Ah cells as the foundation for their next-generation integrated products. This decision largely takes into account the certification period, safety, and the total lifecycle energy issues of both 306Ah and 314Ah cells.

1. Long Certification Period: After selecting the cells, European integrators need to wait for the cells to pass certification, complete the integrated product design, and pass the certification of the integrated product before they can participate in bidding. The 306Ah cells went into mass production earlier, thus their certification process is more advanced.

2. Cell Performance Differences: The 306Ah cells (>10,000 cycles) have a longer life cycle compared to the 314Ah cells (>7,000 cycles). The total life cycle processed energy of the 306Ah cells is nearly comparable to that of the 314Ah cells. In addition, the thermal performance of the 306Ah cells is more controllable compared to the 314Ah cells. As a result, most European integrators choose the 306Ah cells

U.S. Market:

1. The U.S. market is quite segmented.:Many small integrators are optimistic about the optimization potential of the 314Ah cells and choose them to reduce integration costs.

2. Professional integrators like Fluence and Powin, who wish to balance safety and cost-effectiveness, tend to prefer the 306Ah cells and will also public 314Ah integrated products

3. Developer clients like Nextera, who are not highly sensitive to product iterations, focus more on project development and safety and are expected to stick with the 280Ah cells in the short term.

For more information, please contact: cathycai@smm.cn

데이터 출처 설명: 공개 정보를 제외한 모든 데이터는 SMM이 공개 정보, 시장 커뮤니케이션 및 SMM 내부 데이터베이스 모델을 기반으로 가공한 것입니다. 본 자료는 참고용이며 의사결정 권고를 구성하지 않습니다.

문의 사항이 있거나 자세한 정보를 원하시면 아래로 연락해 주시기 바랍니다: lemonzhao@smm.cn
리서치 보고서 열람 방법에 대한 자세한 내용은 아래로 문의하시기 바랍니다:service.en@smm.cn
관련 뉴스
마그네슘 가격 3거래일 연속 상승! 원가 측면은 여전히 '뜨겁게 타오르는' 반면 수요 측면은 바통을 이어받기 어려워 [SMM 논평]
8시간 전
마그네슘 가격 3거래일 연속 상승! 원가 측면은 여전히 '뜨겁게 타오르는' 반면 수요 측면은 바통을 이어받기 어려워 [SMM 논평]
더 보기
마그네슘 가격 3거래일 연속 상승! 원가 측면은 여전히 '뜨겁게 타오르는' 반면 수요 측면은 바통을 이어받기 어려워 [SMM 논평]
마그네슘 가격 3거래일 연속 상승! 원가 측면은 여전히 '뜨겁게 타오르는' 반면 수요 측면은 바통을 이어받기 어려워 [SMM 논평]
8시간 전
SMM 데일리 리뷰: 9월 2일 탄산리튬 현물 가격 하락
10시간 전
SMM 데일리 리뷰: 9월 2일 탄산리튬 현물 가격 하락
더 보기
SMM 데일리 리뷰: 9월 2일 탄산리튬 현물 가격 하락
SMM 데일리 리뷰: 9월 2일 탄산리튬 현물 가격 하락
오늘 SMM 전지급 탄산리튬 현물 가격은 전 거래일 대비 소폭 하락했다. 탄산리튬 2701 계약은 오늘 157,000위안/톤에 낮게 개장한 후 하락세를 보였다. 오전 장중 156,000~157,000위안 구간에서 약세 흐름을 보였으며, 장중 고점은 157,800위안/톤이었다. 정오 무렵 153,200위안/톤까지 급락하며 장중 신저가를 기록했다. 정오 전후로 154,000~156,000위안 구간에서 등락을 반복했다. 오후 장에서는 매수 세력이 일시적으로 가격을 끌어올렸으나 평균 가격선을 돌파하지 못했다. 장 후반 다시 약세를 보이며 결국 3.2% 하락한 154,800위안/톤에 마감했고, 미결제약정은 9,123계약 감소했다. 현물 시장에서는 하류 업체들이 필요에 따라 저가 매수에 나섰다. 155,000위안/톤 이하에서는 하류의 현물 주문 매수 의향이 계속 회복되었다. 공급 측면에서는 가격이 하락함에 따라 현물 주문 판매 의향이 여전히 약했으며, 일부 리튬 화학 공장은 가격을 고수하며 판매를 보류했다. 전반적으로 시장 문의와 실제 거래는 비교적 활발했다.
10시간 전
배터리급 황화리튬: 4분기에 급등할까?
11시간 전
배터리급 황화리튬: 4분기에 급등할까?
더 보기
배터리급 황화리튬: 4분기에 급등할까?
배터리급 황화리튬: 4분기에 급등할까?
핵심 요점: 4분기 급등 가능성은 낮지만 완만한 성장세는 지속될 전망입니다. 월간 생산량은 9~10톤 수준에 머물 것으로 보이며, 이는 3분기 대비 소폭 상승이지 폭발적 도약은 아닙니다.
11시간 전