There is still room for further upside in the price of gold.

게시됨: Jul 08, 2020 13:14 (GMT+8)
출처: Guangfa futures

SMM News: precious metal ETF is an important investment way for market investors to participate in the precious metal market. It is favored by investors for its convenient transaction, low transaction costs and good liquidity. At the same time, the public data of precious metals ETF provides a good observation channel for us to analyze the price trend of precious metals.

There is still much room for development in China's gold ETF market.

On March 28th, the World Gold Council launched the world's first gold ETF--Gold Bullion Securities, and listed on the Australian Stock Exchange.

On November 18, 2004, the largest and most liquid gold ETF--SPDR Gold Trust landed in the United States and traded on NASDAQ. The fund is launched by World Gold Trust Services, a subsidiary of the World Gold Council, and the trustee is the Bank of New York Mellon, which is responsible for calculating daily net asset value and other day-to-day management. The custodian of the gold is the US branch of HSBC, and gold is sold only when redemption and operating rates are paid. Because SPDR is the most popular gold ETF, in the world, its product feature has become the standard of non-leveraged gold ETF.

Silver ETF fund is a kind of financial derivative product which is based on silver and tracks the fluctuation of spot silver price. Large silver producers sell physical silver to fund companies on consignment, and then fund companies rely on this physical silver to publicly issue fund shares on the exchange and sell them to all kinds of investors. Commercial banks act as fund custodian banks and physical custodian banks respectively, and investors can freely redeem them during the existence of the fund. Silver ETF is listed on the stock exchange, and investors can trade silver ETF, as easily as stocks. Low transaction cost is one of the major advantages of Silver ETF. IShares Silver Trust (SLV) is currently the world's largest silver ETF, silver-based assets, designed to track spot silver price trends, belongs to commodity ETF, physical ETF.

In June 2013, China's first gold ETF (Huaan Gold ETF) began to be issued. After years of development, there are four gold ETF, in China: Hua'an Gold ETF, Boshi Gold ETF, Cathay Pacific Gold ETF, Yi Fangda Gold ETF, all take physical gold as the investment target.

From the scale of physical gold positions, the scale of domestic gold ETF is still small. As of April 10, 2020, the total share of domestic four gold ETF is 4.782 billion, and the market value is only 18.65 billion yuan, which is less than 6% of the market value of SPDR Gold Trust positions. Therefore, China's gold market is weak in the global gold pricing system, and it also shows that China's gold ETF market still has more room for development.

There is a close relationship between precious metal prices and ETF positions.

From the perspective of historical statistics, there is a close relationship between precious metal prices and precious metal ETF positions. The trend between the global gold ETF position and the gold price is obviously consistent. In the golden bull market in 2004 and 2012, the gold ETF position size continued to rise with the gold price; and after 2012, the gold ETF position also gradually declined with the gold price. Gold ETF positions have grown steadily since 2015 as gold prices re-entered the upward path, and are now close to the peak of the bull market in 2012. In fact, the positive correlation between the two is as high as 0.79, and the trend is basically the same. In addition, there is no obvious lead or lag between gold prices and ETF positions.

At the same time, the relationship between silver price and silver ETF position is not very close. Especially after the 2012 bull market in precious metals, global silver ETF positions remained high and fluctuated, while silver prices fell from $50 / oz to about $10 / oz. The positive correlation between the two is only 0.38, which is much less than the correlation between gold price and gold ETF position.

The above is the relationship between precious metal ETF and precious metal prices from the long-term trend. In fact, using 100 trading days as a statistical window, we can find that there is a highly positive correlation between gold prices and gold ETF positions in the short term. On the contrary, the correlation between price and ETF position is not very obvious, and the probability of positive correlation and negative correlation is basically equal.

From the long-term and short-term analysis results, gold ETF as a channel to observe the price of gold is more reliable than silver.

There is an obvious logical relationship between gold price and gold ETF position. The absolute level of gold ETF positions and the relative changes of gold positions can objectively reflect the views of market investors on the future of gold. From the perspective of investment on the left side of the market, when the market environment is conducive to the rise of precious metals, some investors begin to apply for gold ETF share in foresight, and the position size of gold ETF increases, which leads to the rise of gold price, which is often synchronized between the two. From the perspective of investment on the right side of the market, when some investors observed the rise in gold prices, for the motivation of investment or speculation, they began to enter the market to purchase gold ETF for investment, resulting in a further increase in the size of ETF positions. Therefore, the gold price and gold ETF position size reflect the characteristics of convergence in the short-term, medium-term and long-term.

Global ETF positions in precious metals hit an all-time high

After the international gold price bottomed out and rebounded in 2015, gold started a nearly five-year "bull market". Based on the bottom $1045.4 per ounce of COMEX gold in 2015, by the close of June 3, 2020, COMEX gold prices had risen 62.9 per cent, with a compound annual return of 10.25 per cent. Over the same period, COMEX silver prices rose 31.82%, with an annual compound rate of return of 5.68%. Corresponding positions in SPDR gold ETF and SLV silver ETF increased by 77.42% and 48.27% respectively.

Since 2019, due to the slowdown in global economic growth, the global central banks, led by the Federal Reserve, have generally adopted loose monetary policies to stimulate the economy. At the same time, the global trade pattern has undergone profound changes, and the continuing trade friction between China and the United States has led to a rise in market risk aversion. In this environment, the enthusiasm for investment in precious metals is high, and the price of precious metals is accelerating upward, along with the rising level of ETF positions in precious metals.

In 2020, the new crown pneumonia epidemic raged around the world, accelerating the pace of global economic decline, and the safe haven assets represented by gold are more favored by the market. Statistics from the World Gold Council show that global gold ETF holdings increased by 623 tons from January to May 2020, exceeding the increase in positions in any year since records began. In particular, despite a sharp drop in trading volume in other asset classes, gold trading volume increased in May, climbing from $140 billion to $164 billion.

The divergence between gold price and ETF position is not sustainable.

Since April 2020, there has been a significant divergence between SPDR positions and gold prices. On the one hand, COMEX gold prices have fluctuated widely between 1680 and 1760 USD / oz since mid-April; on the other hand, SPDR gold ETF positions have risen steadily. As of June 3, 2020, SPDR gold ETF positions reached 1133.37 tons, close to the peak of the 2012 gold bull market. There is a rare out of sync between the two. But the corresponding silver behaves normally. As SLV silver ETF positions continue to increase significantly, silver prices have recently risen significantly, far better than gold, and the gold-silver ratio has fallen back to around 94 from a high of 124 in mid-March.

We believe that the divergence between gold prices and gold ETF positions is not sustainable for two main reasons:

First, SPDR gold ETF investment is a spot investment, investors must first buy the corresponding spot gold, and thus apply for ETF share from SPDR, but do not allow direct cash purchase ETF, this process is relatively cumbersome, generally hold positions for a long time. Therefore, the increase in SPDR gold ETF positions more reflects the willingness of investors to be bullish on medium-and long-term gold.

Second, the recent hesitation in gold prices is mainly due to the increase in short-term risk appetite of the market. Since April, Europe and the United States and other countries have promoted the process of resuming work and production one after another. under the background of extremely loose money and extremely abundant liquidity, the stock markets of Europe and the United States and other countries have risen continuously, recovered their previous losses, and maintained a high level of market risk appetite. In addition, the rate of expansion of the Fed's balance sheet has slowed marginally recently, and the amount of treasury bond purchases per day has fallen from $50 billion in the previous period to $4.5 billion in recent days. Therefore, in the short term, the upward momentum of precious metal prices is insufficient, so it presents the current pattern of wide oscillation.

In essence, this epidemic has undoubtedly accelerated the pace of economic decline in countries such as Europe and the United States. As the economic marginal utility of resuming work and production in Europe and the United States gradually reaches the inflection point, the economic downward pressure in Europe and the United States and other countries may reappear, and then the risk preference of the capital market may usher in an inflection point. In addition, the omni-directional game between China and the United States will also continue to disturb the market risk aversion mood. We believe that there is still room for further upside in gold prices in the future.

Scan the QR code and join the SMM metal communication group.

데이터 출처 설명: 공개 정보를 제외한 모든 데이터는 SMM이 공개 정보, 시장 커뮤니케이션 및 SMM 내부 데이터베이스 모델을 기반으로 가공한 것입니다. 본 자료는 참고용이며 의사결정 권고를 구성하지 않습니다.

문의 사항이 있거나 자세한 정보를 원하시면 아래로 연락해 주시기 바랍니다: lemonzhao@smm.cn
리서치 보고서 열람 방법에 대한 자세한 내용은 아래로 문의하시기 바랍니다:service.en@smm.cn
관련 뉴스
탄자니아 임웰로, 금 회수율 84.5% 상승 후 처리 공정 선정
2026년 09월 25일 16:02 (GMT+8)
탄자니아 임웰로, 금 회수율 84.5% 상승 후 처리 공정 선정
더 보기
탄자니아 임웰로, 금 회수율 84.5% 상승 후 처리 공정 선정
탄자니아 임웰로, 금 회수율 84.5% 상승 후 처리 공정 선정
[SMM 골드 플래시] 레이크 빅토리아 골드는 탄자니아의 완전 허가된 임웰로 골드 프로젝트 C 구역의 풍화 광석에 대한 새로운 제련 시험 결과를 발표했다. 교반 침출 시험에서 마모 세척 후 탈니 처리를 통해 24시간 금 추출률이 49.99%에서 84.54%로 증가했다. 전처리 후 보틀롤 회수율은 88.15%에 도달했으며, 중력 회수 가능한 금도 증가했다. 이번 시험은 음완자에 위치한 네슈 민테크 탄자니아에서 수행되었다. 회사는 점토질이 풍부한 지표 부근 물질의 추가 최적화를 위한 선호 전처리 경로로 마모 세척과 탈니 처리를 확인했다. 레이크 빅토리아 골드는 이번 결과가 약 96~97%의 회수율이 보고된 더 깊은 물질에 대한 이전 시험 결과를 보완한다고 밝혔다. 다만 보고된 회수율은 시험된 전처리 분획에 관한 것이며 아직 전체 광석 플랜트 회수율을 대표하지는 않으며, 추가적인 물질 수지 및 최적화 작업이 계획되어 있다.
2026년 09월 25일 16:02 (GMT+8)
아우룸 드릴링, 코트디부아르 바운디알리에서 155g/t 금 함량 확인
2026년 09월 25일 15:58 (GMT+8)
아우룸 드릴링, 코트디부아르 바운디알리에서 155g/t 금 함량 확인
더 보기
아우룸 드릴링, 코트디부아르 바운디알리에서 155g/t 금 함량 확인
아우룸 드릴링, 코트디부아르 바운디알리에서 155g/t 금 함량 확인
【SMM 골드 플래시】 Aurum Resources는 코트디부아르 바운디알리 골드 프로젝트의 BST1 광상에서 총 6,172.8m 규모의 다이아몬드 시추공 22개에 대한 새로운 분석 결과를 발표했다. 이번 결과에는 195.2m 구간에서 2.63m @ 76.74g/t 금(1.3m @ 155g/t 포함), 108m 구간에서 24m @ 6.31g/t 금(7m @ 19.25g/t 포함)이 포함됐다. 여러 교차 구간은 기존 BST1 자원 범위를 넘어 확장됐다. 이번 결과는 2026년 4분기 초로 예정된 Aurum의 바운디알리 광물자원량 업데이트에 반영될 예정이다. 회사 측은 광화대가 주향 방향과 심부로 계속 열려 있으며, 프로젝트 전역에서 시추가 진행 중이라고 밝혔다. 따라서 이번 결과는 추가 생산이 아닌 탐사 및 자원량 성장 측면의 개발이다. 바운디알리는 현재 JORC 기준 322만 온스의 광물자원량을 보유하고 있으며, Aurum은 최종 타당성 조사를 진행 중이다.
2026년 09월 25일 15:58 (GMT+8)
플래티넘, 금보다 인플레이션 및 실질금리 연관성 더 강해
2026년 09월 25일 15:52 (GMT+8)
플래티넘, 금보다 인플레이션 및 실질금리 연관성 더 강해
더 보기
플래티넘, 금보다 인플레이션 및 실질금리 연관성 더 강해
플래티넘, 금보다 인플레이션 및 실질금리 연관성 더 강해
[SMM 금·PGM 플래시] 상품시장저널(Journal of Commodity Markets)에 발표된 새로운 연구에 따르면, 플래티넘은 금보다 인플레이션 및 실질금리와 더 광범위하고 지속적인 동조화 현상을 보였다. 연구진 아루샤 쿠레이와 이브라힘 외즈멘은 1999년 7월부터 2024년 12월까지 미국, 독일, 이탈리아, 프랑스, 스위스, 네덜란드의 월간 데이터를 전환점 분석, 웨이블릿 결합성, 시간가변 그레인저 인과성 방법을 사용해 분석했다. 연구 결과 금의 거시경제적 연관성은 상대적으로 약하고 단편적인 반면, 플래티넘과 은은 특히 미국과 독일에서 더 광범위한 동조화를 보였다.​ 연구진은 플래티넘의 거시경제 민감도가 더 강한 이유 중 하나로 상당한 산업적 노출을 꼽았다. 즉 플래티넘 가격은 통화 여건뿐 아니라 제조업 활동, 투자, 공급 제약까지 반영한다는 것이다. 이번 연구 결과가 플래티넘이 보편적으로 우수한 인플레이션 헤지 수단임을 입증하는 것은 아니다. 연관성은 국가, 기간, 통화정책 체제에 따라 달랐다. 대신 이 연구는 두 금속 간의 근본적인 차이를 부각한다. 금의 더 광범위한 통화적·방어적 역할이 인플레이션 및 실질금리 여건에 대해 다른 반응을 만들어낸다는 점이다.
2026년 09월 25일 15:52 (GMT+8)