Tesla Starts Megapack 3 Production in Texas

Published: Aug 6, 2026 18:31

Save

Tesla's first Megapack 3 has rolled off the production line at its new Megafactory in Brookshire, Texas, marking the start of initial production at the site.

The factory is designed for 50 GWh of annual capacity, representing a significant expansion of Tesla’s utility-scale energy storage manufacturing footprint. Each Megapack 3 provides approximately 5 MWh of AC energy, while four units can be integrated with a transformer and switchgear to form a 20 MWh Megablock.

Compared with the previous generation, Megapack 3 features a substantially simplified thermal system, with 78% fewer connections. Tesla also states that the Megablock platform can reduce installation time by 23% and construction costs by up to 40%.

Battery cell and supply-chain perspective: Megapack 3 adopts a new 2.8-liter large-format LFP cell platform, with cell supply spanning the United States, Southeast Asia and China. Tesla has not publicly disclosed the nominal Ah capacity of the new cell. However, based on market checks, the platform is moving into the 356 Ah cell class.

Chinese battery manufacturers are expected to remain central to Tesla’s near-term energy-storage supply chain. CATL has been reported as Tesla’s largest energy-storage battery supplier, while BYD and EVE Energy have also joined its supplier pool. At the same time, Tesla is accelerating localization through its Nevada LFP production line and its future U.S. supply agreement with LG Energy Solution.

Market Comment: The launch of Megapack 3 production is more than a manufacturing milestone. It reflects Tesla’s transition toward the 5 MWh product standard, larger-format LFP cells and a geographically diversified supply chain. Chinese cell manufacturers remain strategically important, although Tesla’s sourcing structure is becoming increasingly regionalized.

Tesla Megapack 3 Megafactory energy storage LFP cells

Data Source Statement: Except for publicly available information, all other data are processed by SMM based on publicly available information, market communication, and relying on SMM's internal database model. They are for reference only and do not constitute decision-making recommendations.

For any inquiries or for more information, please contact: lemonzhao@smm.cn

For more information on how to access our research reports, please contact:service.en@smm.cn

Related News

16 mins ago

Lithium Carbonate Market Weekly Review: 8.3-8.6 Spot Lithium Carbonate Price Center Moved Down Slightly WoW [SMM Weekly Review]

16 mins ago

1 hour ago

[SMM Energy Storage Battery Cell Market Weekly Review 8.06] Energy storage battery cell prices remain stable, with large-capacity products expected to accelerate shipments in H2

[SMM Analysis] This week, the energy storage battery cell market remained stable overall. The pullback in lithium chemical prices has not yet significantly transmitted to the battery cell side, and only some orders adopting a raw material linkage mechanism saw slight downward adjustments. The average price of 314 Ah battery cells remained around 0.365 Yuan/Wh. As the implementation details of the battery consumption tax have not yet been released, most battery cell enterprises have not yet uniformly raised prices. The additional tax costs may be shared through negotiation between upstream and downstream players in the industry chain. In terms of product structure, in H1, shipments of large-capacity battery cells above 500 Ah reached approximately 42 GWh, accounting for 8.6%. The market is still dominated by deliveries of 314 Ah products. As large battery cell capacity is gradually released in H2, the shipment share of these cells is expected to increase to around 15%.

1 hour ago

The cobalt powder market remained weak this week, and actual transactions stayed thin.

The cobalt powder market remained weak this week, and actual transactions stayed thin. On the supply side, mainstream producers kept their offers within RMB 440,000‑460,000 per tonne, while some physical deal prices have dipped to RMB 430,000‑440,000 per tonne. More low‑price offers emerged among traders, further depressing market psychological price levels. Cobalt carbonate, the raw material, remained under price pressure. Some offers have fallen below RMB 200,000 per tonne. Market trading nearly stalled with no valid transaction references available. Downstream cemented carbide enterprises are constrained by end‑user orders, showing no acceleration in raw‑material consumption and maintaining slow purchasing rhythms. Apart from long‑term contract orders, spot‑deal volumes are relatively limited. In terms of market sentiment, most participants adopt a wait‑and‑see stance, generally believing that no notable market improvement will materialize in the short term.

1 hour ago