Gold – In the Shadow of the Oil Price Shock

Published: May 6, 2026 14:30
Starting from the new all-time high of USD 5,602 on January 29, the gold price has now been in a correction phase for over three months, characterized so far by two sharp downward waves, two recovery waves, and most recently by another downward wave since mid-April.

6. May 2026

Analysis from 2026-05-03

1. Review – Gold Correction, while Oil Dominates the Market
Starting from the new all-time high of USD 5,602 on January 29, the gold price has now been in a correction phase for over three months, characterized so far by two sharp downward waves, two recovery waves, and most recently by another downward wave since mid-April.

With the lower high of USD 5,419 on March 2 and the lower low of USD 4,099 on March 23, a clear downtrend has been established. Most recently, the gold price failed on April 17 exactly at its 50-day line (USD 4,873) and has since retreated again in a third downward wave. Selling pressure initially increased noticeably over the course of the week. Shortly before the Fed interest rate decision, however, the gold price found a bottom at USD 4,510 and has since been attempting a recovery and a breakout from the short-term downtrend. However, this endeavor has not yet been sustainably convincing or successful, with a weekly closing price of USD 4,613.

1.1 Oil Takes the Lead
In parallel, the oil price has taken the market lead since the American-Israeli attack on Iran, and with high volatility and its clear breakout from the falling wedge, it is shaping both sentiment and price formation in global financial markets. As long as peace negotiations remain without substantial progress and the Strait of Hormuz is blocked, oil price developments are likely to remain the dominant driver of market activity.

From a technical chart perspective, the oil price has been in a major bear market since July 2008. The American-Israeli attack on Iran immediately led to a breakout from the three-and-a-half-year consolidation wedge, after which the oil price rose directly to the 0.382 trend extension of the previous recovery movement, which had developed after the pandemic-induced oil price crash in spring 2020.

The monthly stochastic provides a clear buy signal and still has significant potential before reaching the overbought zone. Furthermore, there is currently no talk of euphoria or overshooting in the oil sector. Even if the strong rise since the end of February probably still requires some consolidation, the chart analysis so far suggests a continuation of the upward movement. The next target is at the upper edge of the large downtrend channel in the range between USD 120 and 125. Beyond that, the next trend extension awaits in the USD 140 range.

1.2 Gold Remains Under Pressure
As announced in good time, the precious metals could not escape this change in leadership and have been under stronger downward pressure compared to other sectors in the last two months, as they slid into the Iran crisis in a significantly overbought state after their historic rally.

Furthermore, the persistent dollar strength is weighing on the gold price and intensifying short-term selling pressure. Technically, the outlook for the gold price also remains under pressure for now: after several consecutive selling sessions, a new bullish signal has slowly emerged since Wednesday. Nevertheless, from a technical perspective, there is currently no reason to significantly increase the strategic weighting of gold in asset allocation. Patience is likely to be required until summer.

2. Chart Analysis Gold in US Dollars
Starting from the prominent triple bottom at USD 1,615 in autumn 2022, the gold price rose by almost 250% to USD 5,602 by January 2026. Since then, a correction has been underway, which has so far led the price back in two sharp downward waves, with a low of USD 4,099, almost exactly to the 38.2% retracement of the three-and-a-half-year upward movement.

However, it is doubtful whether this healthy and necessary correction is already complete. A two-and-a-half-year rally with a price gain of 250% can hardly be fully digested within two months with a pullback to the minimum retracement. Rather, we currently see further need for correction, especially on the time axis, while on the price axis, two strong support zones in the range between approximately USD 4,100 and 4,400, and between USD 3,500 and 3,750, appear very robust until summer.

Although the weekly stochastic is beginning to turn slightly upwards, it has not yet reached its oversold zone in this correction. This also suggests that the correction could still extend in a tricky manner.

Overall, the weekly chart remains slightly bearish for now. While the two Bollinger Bands are moving sideways (currently at USD 5,315 and USD 4,219), the gold price would ideally have to break out of the downtrend of the past three months to significantly increase the chances of a time-based consolidation. For this, an increase above USD 5,000 would be necessary by summer.

If, however, the low of this trading week at USD 4,510 is significantly undercut, the price slide is likely to continue initially into the range of USD 4,150 to 4,250, and the summer rally will start from significantly lower levels.

2.2 Daily Chart: Caught Between the 50- and 200-Day Lines
On the daily chart, the gold price has been in a downtrend since the end of January. The failure at the now falling 50-day line (currently USD 4,834) is particularly significant. This makes it much more difficult for the bulls to recapture this closely watched average on the next attempt. Should the next attempt also fail, the overall picture would darken considerably.

Furthermore, the first test of the 200-day line (currently USD 4,257) is not yet convincing. A second foothold at this even more closely watched average would be typical and even desirable from a chart technical perspective. Since the 200-day line is rising rapidly, the March low of USD 4,099 no longer needs to be undercut for this to happen.

In a sideways corrective scenario, the gold price is therefore likely to remain trapped between the falling 50-day line and the rapidly rising 200-day line until summer, moving confusingly or trickily back and forth. At the same time, the two Bollinger Bands (currently USD 4,558 and USD 4,834) continue to converge, increasingly limiting the short-term range of movement.

This trading week, the bears briefly undercut the lower Bollinger Band, causing it to bend downwards. However, by the end of the week, the bulls managed to halt this advance. This price behavior is not ideal, as sideways Bollinger Bands should not be significantly undercut, otherwise the entire sideways pattern loses stability.

In summary, the oversold daily chart faces an important decision. After the gold price fell from USD 4,890 to temporarily USD 4,510 since April 17, the oversold situation should now actually force a recovery, ideally leading back to and above the 50-day line. Only then could we speak of a progressive bottom formation, and we could look forward to a summer rally around and above USD 5,000.

If, however, the bears exploit the underlying price weakness for further setbacks, the gold price remains vulnerable. In this case, any further recovery is likely to fail at the 50-day line, while the rising 200-day line in the range of USD 4,300 to 4,000 becomes the next target.

3. Futures Market Structure Gold
According to the weekly Commitments of Traders Report (COT Report) from the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), commercial traders held a cumulative short position of 194,813 gold futures contracts at the closing price of USD 4,596. The price slide on Wednesday probably improved the situation slightly, but the commercial short position is still too high in a long-term comparison. Truly good contrarian entry points or turning points in the past were usually only found with a cumulative short position below 100,000 contracts. However, the futures market traffic light could turn light green in the range around 150,000 contracts.

Overall, based on the last 22 years, the CoT report is provisionally to be interpreted as rather negative.

4. Gold Sentiment
Parallel to the new all-time high of USD 5,602 and the ongoing correction since then, sentiment in the gold market has also clearly shifted. The Sentiment Optix index indicates that the top marked the end of a prolonged period of euphoria. In the worst-case scenario, the sentiment pendulum could now swing to the opposite extreme (panic and fear). However, it is equally conceivable that sentiment simply continues to calm down and market participants’ interest gradually wanes in a quieter market phase – without the need for a drastic shakeout.

In summary, sentiment remains in the neutral zone with an Optix value of 59. Ideally, the Optix will soon turn upwards again above 50-55. Otherwise, the probability of an extended correction increases significantly.

5. Gold Seasonality
Statistically, the gold price is in a seasonally weak phase until June. The expected recovery rally carried prices upwards again until April, as predicted. With the loss of seasonal support, much now suggests that in the coming weeks – regardless of interim counter-movements – lower prices and thus a continuation of the correction are to be expected. Typically, gold only finds a sustainable bottom in late spring or early summer, which then forms the basis for a summer rally. Until then, patience is required.

Overall, the seasonal traffic light remains red until at least June.

6. Macro Update – Debt, Power, Energy, and Gold
It is no secret that the United States has been living beyond its means for decades, financing its current account deficits through foreign debt and the role of the petrodollar. However, a US debt of over USD 39 trillion is not an abstract accounting entry, but a magnitude that would be difficult to grasp even by liquidating all profits, gold reserves, Bitcoins, or tax revenues. It shows how deeply the American financial order is now embedded in a debt logic that has long since detached itself from any realistic repayment capacity.

As this high national and foreign debt increasingly limits the USA’s financial leeway, it is acting more and more frequently in foreign policy like an over-indebted state, attempting to stabilize its asset and debt situation through tariffs, sanctions, and geopolitical pressure. Trump’s policy is therefore not only an expression of power politics but also an attempt to improve America’s net asset position through trade conflicts, energy deals, and political blackmail. It is likely that the Trump family is enriching itself considerably in the process.

6.1 Imbalance in Global Wealth Distribution
The deep financial imbalance of the USA can be clearly seen in its net international investment position. This measures a country’s total net wealth vis-à-vis other countries, i.e., the balance of all foreign assets and liabilities of the state, companies, and private households. While Germany, China, and Japan have built up large positive net international investment positions through years of export surpluses, the USA shows an extremely negative position of minus USD 27.5 trillion, or about 88% of its GDP, which has further deteriorated since 2008.

From this perspective, the global distribution of wealth also becomes clear: surplus countries build up foreign assets, while deficit countries accumulate foreign liabilities. These holdings shape the international power order far more than short-term economic fluctuations. For decades, the USA has allowed itself consumption and import surpluses, which were ultimately financed by foreign creditors. Precisely this imbalance is a central background for America’s tougher foreign economic and security policy and for the growing efforts to create economic and security dependencies. From this logic, the USA does not escalate current tensions “by accident” but acts as a highly indebted power that seeks to stabilize its financial and geopolitical situation through pressure, conflicts, and control of resources.

The current global situation can therefore hardly be described using the categories of a stable post-war order. Rather, geopolitical, monetary, and institutional tensions are intensifying into a phase of structural uncertainty, in which old certainties lose their binding power and new centers of power vie for influence. This is particularly evident in the role of the petrodollar.

6.2 The Petrodollar Under Pressure
For decades, it has supported the international position of the USA by conducting trade in oil and other strategic raw materials predominantly in dollars. As long as the world’s energy raw materials are denominated in dollars, demand for American financial instruments remains structurally high. But this system comes under pressure as soon as major producing countries begin to define their interests more independently and reduce their dependence on the dollar area.

6.3 Iran, Hormuz, and the Oil Price Shock
The conflict with Iran in this context is far more than a regional war. It affects one of the most sensitive junctions of the global economy: the Strait of Hormuz. As soon as supply chains, energy flows, and insurance mechanisms are disrupted there, not only do oil prices rise, but also geopolitical risk premiums for the entire global economy. The actual conflict thus extends far beyond the Middle East because it directly affects the stability of the dollar-based trading and financial system.

6.4 The UAE’s OPEC Break
Politically, this step is highly significant, but in the short term, it is overshadowed by the much larger supply shock surrounding the blocked Strait of Hormuz. As long as this bottleneck persists, oil prices are likely to remain high and volatile. While the UAE can prospectively leverage its influence on the market through higher production volumes, this lever remains limited for now as long as the export flow itself is disrupted.

Precisely this makes the development so explosive. The OPEC alliance was a central stabilizer of the oil market for decades and, at the same time, an indirect pillar of the petrodollar system. If this cohesion crumbles, the scope for individual producers to implement their production policies more flexibly and strategically grows. The fact that the UAE is increasingly prioritizing national interests is therefore not a diplomatic detail but a signal of a deeper shift within the energy order.

In addition, geopolitical tensions in the energy market can no longer be viewed in isolation today. Oil, gas, aluminum, fertilizers, chemicals, and transport are closely intertwined. As soon as supply bottlenecks occur, secondary price shocks arise in almost all industrial value chains. The damage is therefore not limited to the energy sector but extends throughout global production and world trade.

In this situation, financial flows are also shifting. If states, central banks, and private investors begin to question their dollar dependence, the attractiveness of those assets that are not merely claims on future payments but are themselves scarce and anchored outside the debt system increases. It is precisely at this point that gold moves further and further into the center, because gold is not a promise of payment but an asset without counterparty risk.

6.5 China Between Energy Dependence and Gold Accumulation
For China, a dual picture emerges. As the world’s largest oil importer, the country is particularly affected by higher energy prices, while at the same time continuing to expand its gold reserves. This speaks for a long-term diversification of reserves and an attempt to gradually become less dependent on the dollar and the US financial system. The high uncertainty in the energy market also supports the structural demand for hedges like gold, even if a stronger US dollar and declining safe-haven purchases can put short-term pressure on the gold price.

6.6 Gold as an Alternative to the Debt System
The growing demand for gold cannot therefore be understood merely as a reaction to speculation or panic, but as an expression of a deeper distrust of the fiat money system. The more public and private balance sheets are burdened with liabilities, the greater the need for a store of value that does not depend on the creditworthiness of a state or a bank. Gold thus becomes insurance against monetary and geopolitical instability.

This is all the more true as financial markets themselves appear more fragile than the major indices suggest. A narrow market breadth, rising national debt, and growing dependence on liquidity often obscure how vulnerable stability actually is. If, at the same time, bond markets become nervous, energy prices rise, and geopolitical tensions increase, the seemingly robust market picture falters. It then becomes clear that valuations depend not only on profits but also on political and monetary credibility.

The United States finds itself in a dual field of tension. On the one hand, it must maintain its global leadership role; on the other hand, its financial vulnerability is growing due to high deficits, foreign debt, and the declining willingness of other countries to absorb American liabilities indefinitely. This combination creates a dangerous incentive for escalation: those under domestic political and financial pressure are more likely to resort to toughness and confrontation in foreign policy.

Precisely for this reason, the Iran conflict should not be viewed in isolation but as part of a larger systemic crisis. It is not just about security in the Middle East, but about how long the dollar-based world order can still be held together by geopolitical dominance, energy dependence, and financial liquidity. The more this order erodes, the more important alternative asset forms, reserve policies, and strategic hedging become.

The future of the global economy is therefore likely to be characterized less by linear growth than by bloc formation, hedging, and strategic alignment. States will try to diversify their supply security, their currency reserves, and their access to raw materials. Companies will reorient their supply chains, and investors will have to distinguish more clearly between nominal returns and real value preservation. This is not an environment for blind optimism.

6.7 Fragmentation Instead of Stability, Hence Gold
In conclusion, gold must be understood as a strategic anchor in a fragmented world. Not because gold solves every crisis, but because it offers a rare constant in an environment of national debt, geopolitical uncertainty, and loss of trust. Especially when financial markets are characterized by liquidity, interventions, and political tensions, an asset that stands outside the debt system gains importance. Gold is thus less an object of speculation than an indicator of how fragile trust in the current world order has become.

7. Conclusion: Gold – In the Shadow of the Oil Price Shock
Despite its long-term intact strategic importance, gold remains a market of patience for now. After the spectacular rally to an all-time high, including significant overheating, the correction that has been underway for over three months is neither surprising nor complete, but rather the necessary digestion phase of an extraordinary upward movement. In the short term, much suggests that gold has not yet transitioned back into a clean new uptrend but continues to oscillate between technical relief and new vulnerability.

The decisive factor is less gold itself than the market environment in which it must assert itself. The oil price has taken on the role of the dominant impulse generator because geopolitical tensions, energy scarcity, and inflation concerns are shifting risk premiums in financial markets. As long as this situation persists, gold remains relevant as a safe haven but is temporarily constrained by dollar strength, interest rate speculation, and a harsher sentiment. This suggests a volatile interim phase rather than an immediate return to euphoria.

The real message is therefore: gold is structurally strong but tactically under pressure. The market is working off the overshooting of the past months, while beneath the surface, arguments for gold as a crisis and hedging instrument are already intensifying. Those who only look at the next few days see correction; those who consider the bigger picture recognize a world in which debt, fragmentation, and geopolitical pressure do not weaken gold but enhance its long-term value.

Overall, we expect a sideways movement until early summer, between the falling 50-day and the rising 200-day lines, i.e., between approximately USD 3,350 and 4,350.

Source:https://goldinvest.de/en/gold-in-the-shadow-of-the-oil-price-shock/

Data Source Statement: Except for publicly available information, all other data are processed by SMM based on publicly available information, market communication, and relying on SMM‘s internal database model. They are for reference only and do not constitute decision-making recommendations.

For any inquiries or to learn more information, please contact: lemonzhao@smm.cn
For more information on how to access our research reports, please contact:service.en@smm.cn