AIIS seeks support to address concerns about steel imports investigation

Publicado: May 9, 2017 13:55
AIIS has written a letter, requesting support to develop a responsible, fact-based analysis to address concerns relating to recent initiation of an investigation.

May 09, 2017 01:30:06 AM

Falls Church, VA (AIIS) - AIIS Board Chairman John Foster has written a letter to all AIIS members and other interested parties, requesting support to develop a responsible, fact-based analysis to address concerns relating to the recent initiation of an investigation to determine the effects on national security of steel imports.

Date: May 4, 2017

Falls Church, VA. May 4, 2017. Ladies and gentlemen, we urgently need your generous assistance.

I am writing to request a special, one-time contribution, as much as you can afford, to help us defray the costs of developing a responsible, fact-based analysis to address the April 20, 2017 initiation of a Commerce Department investigation under section 232(b)(1)(A) of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to “…determine the effects on national security of steel imports.”

As you have heard us say many times, the AIIS is the last real voice in Washington for free and responsible trade in steel. As we have also noted many times, a strong and healthy domestic steel industry is important for America’s economy. As President Kennedy famously stated, “a rising tide lifts all the boats.” A healthy, robust domestic steel industry, and a vibrant steel importing sector, are both essential for our domestic manufacturing base, and are both associated with vigorous, sustained GDP growth. Our manufacturing sector has been well served by both domestic and foreign producers in a roughly 80/20% ratio respectively over the last several decades. This ratio has been instrumental in keeping our downstream manufacturers globally competitive. In fact, because it was economically prudent to do so, 19.8% of all imported steel in 2016 was purchased by domestic mills in the form of slabs, blooms and billets. If our steel-using manufacturers are not able to effectively compete globally, the entire steel supply chain will suffer, jeopardizing the livelihoods of the tens of thousands of men and women whose jobs depend on it.

In our view, responsibly traded imports of steel are not the major problem facing the domestic producers, but rather the ever-cyclical, prevailing market conditions, a continuing global over supply of steel, and, with all due respect, certain inherent cost and/or efficiency issues in some cases. An AIIS representative sat side-by-side with representatives of domestic producers at last year’s USTR hearing to address mutually recognized global over supply problems. We helped lead the discussion at this hearing on China’s extensive use of trade-distorting, state-owned enterprises, which are so often at the heart of those problems. These are issues that hurt all of us in the global steel realm, and together we forged an alliance that succeeded in placing them at the top of the Administration’s agenda for the G 20 Summit. As a consequence of United States leadership in this matter, the G 20 countries formally recognized that the global excess capacity in steel was a most serious problem requiring an effective, collective response. The Global Steel Over Supply Forum, the first global initiative of its kind, was created as a result.
All that said, it is not news that the new Administration is taking a notably aggressive stance with respect to existing and proposed trade agreements.

Regardless of one’s politics, this can be viewed as being proactive, especially where the United States is thought to have been disadvantaged as a consequence of certain positions.

As companies whose livelihoods depend upon the international steel supply chain, I respectfully suggest that we ought to emphasize two points with respect to the new Administration’s approach to trade. First, we must stress a deliberate, thoughtful approach, taking care not to throw out the baby with the bath water, as the saying goes. In addition, we must also be diligent in making sure that the Administration does not overreach by unnecessarily constricting one economic sector to the detriment of our manufacturing base, and the tens of thousands of jobs that comprise the imported steel supply chain: union and non-union longshoremen, our blue and brown water ports, steamship carriers, truckers, warehousing and material handlers, railroad and barging companies, Customs brokers, insurance carriers, and of course, the steel trading companies themselves.

This will take a special effort outside of the normal course of our business, and that requires special funding. The AIIS is mounting several initiatives to clearly, factually, and respectfully highlight the potential harm of overreaching with new, unwarranted steel trade restrictions, particularly as it also seeks to enhance the economy’s low performance over the past several years.

Accordingly, we request your generous assistance for the following:

1) To engage a top economic group to accurately quantify the negative effects of new, unwarranted import restrictions on responsibly traded steel on jobs, tax revenues, and supply chain efficiencies of responsibly traded steel imports.

2) To update our Martin Study of 2006 specifically addressing the negative effects on the nation’s port communities and Maritime Transportation System.

3) To defray related logistics and professional services costs to effectively advance our position at the leading edge of any and all opportunities in Washington, D.C. and elsewhere, particularly in any hearings or other forums where such a voice is needed.

We estimate that these costs will amount to approximately $150,000 or more. We urgently need your help to support the jobs and industry sectors mentioned above. Your contribution of $1,000, $10,000, or more, to this extraordinarily important cause will help us mount the most effective effort on your behalf, and on behalf of our entire steel supply chain.

If we do not embrace this challenge together, there will be no other voice.

Please send your most generous contribution to:

American Institute for International Steel
701 West Broad Street
Suite 301
Falls Church, Va. 22046

Alternatively, you may contact Assistant Director Alexandra Jopp at Jopp@aiis.org to arrange for an electronic payment.

Best regards.

John D. Foster
AIIS Chairman
American Institute for International Steel |Tel: 713-875-1236

Courtesy : AIIS

Declaração sobre a Fonte de Dados: Com exceção das informações publicamente disponíveis, todos os demais dados são processados pela SMM com base em informações publicamente disponíveis, comunicação de mercado e com base no modelo de base de dados interna da SMM. São apenas para referência e não constituem recomendações para a tomada de decisão.

Para quaisquer perguntas ou para obter mais informações, entre em contato: lemonzhao@smm.cn
Para mais informações sobre como aceder aos nossos relatórios de investigação, entre em contato:service.en@smm.cn
Notícias Relacionadas
Australia Reviews Anti-Dumping Duties on Galvanized Steel from India, Malaysia, Vietnam Amid Zinc Concerns
11 Sep 2026 18:30
Australia Reviews Anti-Dumping Duties on Galvanized Steel from India, Malaysia, Vietnam Amid Zinc Concerns
Leia mais
Australia Reviews Anti-Dumping Duties on Galvanized Steel from India, Malaysia, Vietnam Amid Zinc Concerns
Australia Reviews Anti-Dumping Duties on Galvanized Steel from India, Malaysia, Vietnam Amid Zinc Concerns
On September 9, 2026, Australia initiated its second sunset review of anti-dumping measures on galvanized steel sheet from India, Malaysia and Vietnam, and separately launched a sunset review of countervailing measures on imports from India. The review covers July 2025-June 2026, with the final report expected by February 11, 2027. As galvanized steel is the largest end-use sector for zinc, the measures directly affect export costs and competitiveness, potentially impacting Australia’s domestic zinc demand and supply chain. Maintaining the duties would provide some protection for domestic steel and coating capacity, while termination could increase low-priced imports and affect regional zinc consumption. The final outcome remains subject to the authorities’ determination.
11 Sep 2026 18:30
Projeto de expansão de US$ 200 milhões da JCC Hongyuan Copper visa aumentar a capacidade para 550.000 toneladas até 2027
7 Sep 2026 15:43
Projeto de expansão de US$ 200 milhões da JCC Hongyuan Copper visa aumentar a capacidade para 550.000 toneladas até 2027
Leia mais
Projeto de expansão de US$ 200 milhões da JCC Hongyuan Copper visa aumentar a capacidade para 550.000 toneladas até 2027
Projeto de expansão de US$ 200 milhões da JCC Hongyuan Copper visa aumentar a capacidade para 550.000 toneladas até 2027
O projeto de expansão de 300 mil toneladas/ano de cátodos de cobre da JCC Hongyuan Copper, subsidiária da Jiangxi Copper Corporation, entrou na fase de aviso público de pré-aprovação de sua avaliação de impacto ambiental em 4 de setembro, com investimento total de aproximadamente 1,416 bilhão de yuans. O projeto está previsto para iniciar a construção em setembro de 2026 e ser concluído em dezembro de 2027. Após a conclusão, a capacidade total da JCC Hongyuan saltará de 250 mil toneladas para 550 mil toneladas.
7 Sep 2026 15:43
Iene japonês sobe e USD/JPY cai abaixo de 159 em meio a especulações de intervenção
3 Sep 2026 19:00
Iene japonês sobe e USD/JPY cai abaixo de 159 em meio a especulações de intervenção
Leia mais
Iene japonês sobe e USD/JPY cai abaixo de 159 em meio a especulações de intervenção
Iene japonês sobe e USD/JPY cai abaixo de 159 em meio a especulações de intervenção
[SMM Expresso Metais Preciosos] O iene japonês disparou acentuadamente durante o pregão de quarta-feira, com o USD/JPY caindo abaixo de 159 e fechando em queda de 0,92%, a 158,69, alimentando especulações sobre intervenção cambial japonesa. O índice do dólar também caiu fortemente, e o ambiente de dólar mais fraco deu suporte aos metais preciosos.
3 Sep 2026 19:00