Mike Marley Shredded Power #36

Publicado: Mar 16, 2016 08:58 (GMT+8)
Domestic steelmakers would buy more scrap now if it was offered at current prices.

By Paul Ploumis (ScrapMonster Author)

March 15, 2016 05:07:00 PM

WSEM - World Steel Exchange Marketing - Mike Marley’s Shredded Power #36

Export demand takes over; prices could rise in April.

March 15, 2016

Mike Marley (484) 751-5600

Peter F. Marcus (201) 503-0902

All but the fluff - Commentary

Domestic steelmakers would buy more scrap now if it was offered at current prices. Unfortunately, said an Eastern broker, few dealers are willing to sell more. They haven’t yet pocketed the $10-per-gross-ton increases gained in this month’s scrap sales, he said and a few still owe tons from February orders. Yet, many are already banking on another price hike in April, possibly by as much as $30 per ton.

Such mid-month guesstimates probably will be revised as the end of the month approaches. Still, there is a widespread consensus that the prices and demand are not going down in the near term. Whether that includes the other months of the second quarter as well as April is uncertain. Forecasts from dealers and traders in the industry normally don’t extend much further than the next month to 45 days.

These greater expectations have been stirred by the larger appetites displayed by domestic EAF-based sheet mills and their decisions to reach out to distant suppliers. Add to that a spike in buying prices in Turkey and a resurgent demand in Asia. U.S. scrap traders see that as another sign that the tide has turned for scrap prices and demand.

Deals with European suppliers have raised the 80/20 heavy melt to $215 per tonne delivered to a Turkish port. That is up by about $40 per tonne from a month ago. The Europeans have been the sole beneficiaries of this new business in Turkey thus far, largely because U.S. exporters have little inventory. Because of the weakness of Turkish demand prior to this latest buying binge, U.S. exporters sold much of their scrap to domestic mills and cut their buying prices. They aren’t competitive with the prices domestic mills are offering.

That’s why U.S. exporters now are looking for as much as $230 per ton for heavy melt from their Turkish customers, an East Coast trader said. That’s $10-per ton more than the Turkish mills are willing to pay, yet the U.S. exporters believe they need higher offshore prices to enable them to buy more scrap and maintain a profit.

The exporter snow are paying about $140-145 per gross ton to local yards for heavy melt and about $160 per ton to the larger dealers in inland regions. One eastern Ohio dealer said that hasn’t persuaded him to sell them much. Supplies of heavy melt and shredded are tight and they’ll have to pay more to take it away from the domestic mills, he said.

Shredded scrap normally commands a $5 per tonne premium over 80/20 heavy melt in the offshore market. That would put it at about $220 per tonne as part of the cargoes bought from European suppliers, and Turkish mills might be willing to pay as much as $225 per tonne. With stevedoring and ocean freight costs for a bulk cargo from the U.S. at between $25 and $30 per tonne, that would lower the price on the docks to about $195-200 per tonne.

But U.S. exporters and coastal suppliers already have more attractive offers from several Indian traders. They are offering as much as $210 per tonne at the dock for containers loaded with shredded scrap, at least $10 above the price exporters can get from Turkey.

In addition to India, prices are climbing elsewhere in the Far East. Taiwanese mills hiked their offers for containerized shipments of 80/20 heavy melt to $180 per tonne delivered to their ports, up about $10 per ton from a week ago and the second price increase in as many weeks. One U.S. trader said Asian scrap demand and prices had reversed course after being in a buying funk for the past year.

He attributed this to a recent increase in iron ore prices and Chinese steel traders’ decisions to limit offshore steel sales, not only to Taiwan but to other countries in the region as well. He believes the Chinese mills are trying to eliminate their losses on steel. Several have been relying on cash flow and bank loans to pay workers’ wages and operating costs. Mills in Japan, South Korea and other Asian nations are buying more scrap and boosting their raw steel output to offset those steel shortages and higher prices for their Chinese billet.

But the rise in offshore scrap demand troubles U.S. mill buyers and their brokers. Some failed to get as much as they wanted this month and contend that dealers held back scrap after realizing that mills were looking for more tons. One dealer offered 1,000 tons of busheling early in the buy week, said a Pittsburgh area broker, but later backpedaled. When the time arrived to finalize the deal, he only had 750 tons. On the other hand, dealers argue that intake of obsolete scrap is still poor because of low prices in recent months. An Eastern dealer said he could offer half of what he expected to have, in part because he still owes so much scrap from last month’s sales.

Local scrap prices in the Midwest and South were up by an average of about $10 per ton last week, but those gains masked the frenzied long-distance purchasing by the flat-rolled EAF mills. Springboard buys from scrap suppliers in the western states and New England hiked some mill-delivered prices by more than $40 per ton. Part of those increases included higher freight costs from these distant scrap yards.

Increased domestic steel demand may also account for that spike in scrap demand and prices. The new duties on foreign flat-rolled steel products, particularly cold-rolled and galvanized, may be spurring U.S. steel users and service centers to buy more domestic steel. But others argue that the closures of some of the domestic integrated steel industry’s facilities has shifted sheet demand to the domestic EAF-based flat-rolled mills.

Regardless of the reasons, dealers said shredded scrap, heavy melt and other obsolete grades are still short in many regions. Scale prices at many yards have been unchanged for months, said a Chicago-based trader, and have discouraged peddlers and other scrap suppliers even more than the winter temperatures and infrequent snowstorms this year.

That could change in coming weeks, though. Shredders in the competitive northern Ohio market, for example, have raised their buying prices for feedstock by$15 per ton in the past week, more than the average gains in the mill buying prices this month. Some now are paying $130 per net ton (or about $143 per gross ton)for feedstock. Such increases have earned derision from their counterparts elsewhere. “They complain about margins,” said one trader in the Southeast who has not raised his buying prices. “They get an increase and now they can’t wait to give it away.”

Busheling and other industrial steel scrap had been plentiful until this month, but now even those supplies are tight. Industrial scrap had been trading at a discount of as much as $20 per ton to shredded scrap for several months; it is now at the same price in several regions. Detroit, where the pace of production at the auto plants and their component makers remains strong, is still an exception.

Local prices for busheling range from $185 to as much as $205 per ton on a delivered to the mill basis, but higher offers were made to distant suppliers. Shredded prices have soared to as high as $220 per ton in Chicago, but demand there is influenced by mills at the lower end of the Mississippi River. Local mills in the Chicago area, including some of the integrated steelmakers, had to raise their offers to keep some of that scrap from leaving town, said a Chicago-based trader.

Demand may be stronger for busheling and other industrial steel scrap, but has not risen to the levels that would restore the traditional busheling premium over shredded scrap. But some believe that could occur in April if the flows of obsolete rise as much as they are expected to do in the spring months. Some traders question whether these spring scrap floods will occur this year. Auto wreckers and smaller scrap yards may continue to hold back shreddables from the bigger scrap processors next month. Like some scrap dealers, they may be banking on another increase in prices by the mills in April and waiting for the shredders and others to boost their buying prices.

U.S. Shredded Scrap Thermometer: Is export in command now?

Battle lines are drawn in the three-ways competition between domestic steelmakers, dealers and offshore mills for the price-constrained and seasonally short supplies of shredded and other obsolete scrap. Such conflicts were common five years ago when scrap exports totalled to as much as 24million tonnes per annum, but have been rare and short-lived in recent years. U.S. exports last year totalled about 13 million tonnes. Weaker foreign steel markets and excessive supplies of Chinese steel have been moderating forces. That has shifted and the potential restart of past practices could trouble steelmakers and again empower scrap dealers. These included:

Coastal steel mills and even some in inland regions had to battle exporters for heavy melt and shredded scrap when offshore demand was stronger in past years. Some mills abandoned their practices of setting a single price at the beginning of the month. They often had to hike their offers two or three times a week in response to word that the exporters were raising prices to build inventory at the dock and avoid potential demurrage expenses incurred when the vessel must wait to be filled.

Export yards are set up to sell and ship scrap to foreign steel mills primarily. When they’re selling into the domestic market, rival dealers argue that they undermine their bargaining power. In past years, dealers in an inland region were sure they would see price increases of $40 or $50 per ton only to find that the local mills had bought much of what they needed from exporters or other coastal scrap yards.

Some domestic steelmakers now depend on export yards and coastal scrap dealers to fill a portion of their melt needs every month. This month, however, there was not as much scrap available there. Intake may still be poor, said one Eastern mill buyer, but some dealers may also be awaiting more lucrative offers from a foreign steelmaker or scrap trader.

Some traders believe the only certainty about the offshore scrap market is its uncertainty. Some “wild cards” demonstrate how unpredictable this scrap market can be. These are:

Despite reports about cutbacks in capacity, China’s 800-million steelmaking juggernaut probably won’t shed as much of its excess capacity as some expect. If scrap prices rise sharply and Chinese mills believe they can obtain higher prices for their steel, they may choose to export more. That could quickly depress offshore demand for scrap.

NASDAQ OMX Commodities (Stockholm) will begin trading in the Midwest US shredded scrap index futures on Tuesday March 29.The contract will trade in 20-gross ton units with the prices settled on the 11th day of each month against the TSI Midwest US Shredded Scrap Index. For additional information about shredded futures trading, contact John Conheeney at WSEM. His phone number is 201-503-0922 and his email is jconheeney@wsemgroup.com.

 

Note: Each issue, Mike Marley gives his opinion on the one-month steel scrap price outlook. He explains the key reasons for his view and highlights the “wild cards” that might cause him to be wrong.

This report includes “forward-looking” statements that are based on current expectations about future events and are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to operations and the business environment, all of which are difficult to predict. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, they can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties, including among other things, changes in prices, shifts in demand, variations in supply, international currency movements, technological developments, governmental actions and/or other factors.

The information contained in this report is based upon or derived from sources that are believed to be reliable; however, no representation is made that such information is accurate or complete in all material respects, and reliance upon such information as the basis for taking any action is neither authorized nor warranted. WSD does not solicit, and avoids receiving, non-public material information from its clients and contacts in the course of its business. The information that we publish in our reports and communicate to our clients is not based on material non-public information.

The officers, directors, employees or stockholders of World Steel Dynamics Inc. do not directly or indirectly hold securities of, or that are related to, one or more of the companies that are referred to herein. World Steel Dynamics Inc. may act as a consultant to one or more of the companies mentioned in this report.


Declaração sobre a Fonte de Dados: Com exceção das informações publicamente disponíveis, todos os demais dados são processados pela SMM com base em informações publicamente disponíveis, comunicação de mercado e com base no modelo de base de dados interna da SMM. São apenas para referência e não constituem recomendações para a tomada de decisão.

Para quaisquer perguntas ou para obter mais informações, entre em contato: lemonzhao@smm.cn
Para mais informações sobre como aceder aos nossos relatórios de investigação, entre em contato:service.en@smm.cn
Notícias Relacionadas
KGHM e South32 lançam expansão de US$ 725 milhões em Sierra Gorda, elevando a capacidade de cobre em 26%
02 Oct 2026 16:31 (GMT+8)
KGHM e South32 lançam expansão de US$ 725 milhões em Sierra Gorda, elevando a capacidade de cobre em 26%
Leia mais
KGHM e South32 lançam expansão de US$ 725 milhões em Sierra Gorda, elevando a capacidade de cobre em 26%
KGHM e South32 lançam expansão de US$ 725 milhões em Sierra Gorda, elevando a capacidade de cobre em 26%
KGHM e South32 iniciaram a construção de uma quarta linha de moagem na mina de cobre-molibdênio Sierra Gorda, na região de Atacama, no Chile. A expansão de US$ 725 milhões terá duração de três anos a partir de janeiro de 2027, com conclusão até o final de 2029 e produção plena no segundo semestre de 2030. A capacidade de processamento de minério aumentará 26%, de 131.000 toneladas por dia para 165.000 tpd. A produção anual de cobre deve subir de 165.000 toneladas em 2025 para 195.000 toneladas, com 6.000 toneladas de molibdênio, 58.000 onças de ouro e 1,7 milhão de onças de prata como subprodutos. O projeto criará mais de 900 empregos diretos e será financiado pelo fluxo de caixa operacional e por dívida. Espera-se que os custos operacionais unitários caiam cerca de 10%.
02 Oct 2026 16:31 (GMT+8)
Emerita estende a revisão final do PFS da Faixa Piritosa Ibérica Ocidental, com divulgação prevista para as próximas semanas
02 Oct 2026 15:31 (GMT+8)
Emerita estende a revisão final do PFS da Faixa Piritosa Ibérica Ocidental, com divulgação prevista para as próximas semanas
Leia mais
Emerita estende a revisão final do PFS da Faixa Piritosa Ibérica Ocidental, com divulgação prevista para as próximas semanas
Emerita estende a revisão final do PFS da Faixa Piritosa Ibérica Ocidental, com divulgação prevista para as próximas semanas
Emerita Resources forneceu uma atualização sobre o Estudo de Viabilidade Preliminar (PFS) do seu projeto polimetálico Iberian Belt West, na Espanha, afirmando que o estudo está bastante avançado, mas ainda em revisão técnica final. A empresa informou que o processo de revisão foi ampliado para incluir supervisão técnica e de garantia de qualidade adicional antes da publicação. Como resultado, a Emerita agora espera que o PFS seja divulgado nas próximas semanas, em vez do prazo anteriormente indicado. O Iberian Belt West contém mineralização de cobre, zinco, chumbo, ouro e prata e é um dos principais ativos em fase de desenvolvimento da Emerita na Espanha. Espera-se que o PFS forneça detalhes atualizados sobre o plano de mina proposto, configuração do processamento, requisitos de capital, custos operacionais e economia do projeto. A Emerita afirmou que o trabalho de revisão adicional visa garantir consistência e completude entre as disciplinas técnicas que contribuem para o estudo antes de sua finalização. A empresa não anunciou uma data de publicação específica revisada, e nenhum novo dado de produção, capital ou econômico foi divulgado na atualização mais recente. A revisão estendida adia o próximo grande marco técnico do Iberian Belt West, mas a empresa continua indicando que o PFS está próximo da conclusão. Para o mercado de cobre, a importância do estudo dependerá do perfil de produção e da economia do projeto finalmente divulgados, particularmente a contribuição do cobre em relação aos outros metais pagáveis do projeto. A atenção, portanto, permanecerá voltada para o momento da divulgação do PFS e se o estudo final alterará materialmente as perspectivas de desenvolvimento do projeto.
02 Oct 2026 15:31 (GMT+8)
Cascadia Intersecta 75,55 m com 1,19% de Cu no Projeto de Cobre-Ouro Carmacks
02 Oct 2026 15:27 (GMT+8)
Cascadia Intersecta 75,55 m com 1,19% de Cu no Projeto de Cobre-Ouro Carmacks
Leia mais
Cascadia Intersecta 75,55 m com 1,19% de Cu no Projeto de Cobre-Ouro Carmacks
Cascadia Intersecta 75,55 m com 1,19% de Cu no Projeto de Cobre-Ouro Carmacks
Cascadia Minerals relatou resultados adicionais de perfuração de seu programa de exploração de 2026 no projeto de cobre-ouro Carmacks, em Yukon, Canadá, com novas perfurações de expansão estendendo a mineralização na Zona 2000S além dos limites do Recurso Mineral existente. O furo de sondagem CD-26-058 retornou 75,55 metros com teor de 1,19% de cobre, 0,97 g/t de ouro, 10,4 g/t de prata e 335 ppm de molibdênio, equivalente a 2,18% de cobre equivalente. O intervalo incluiu 48,66 metros com teor de 1,61% de cobre, 1,39 g/t de ouro, 15,1 g/t de prata e 475 ppm de molibdênio, equivalente a 3,03% de CuEq. No mesmo furo, um intervalo de maior teor de 14,50 metros retornou 2,30% de cobre, 2,68 g/t de ouro, 29,5 g/t de prata e 1.015 ppm de molibdênio, equivalente a 5,08% de CuEq. Um segundo furo, CD-26-059, interceptou 93,99 metros com teor de 0,96% de cobre, 0,70 g/t de ouro, 4,6 g/t de prata e 919 ppm de molibdênio, equivalente a 1,94% de CuEq. Isso incluiu 63,97 metros com 1,26% de cobre, 0,96 g/t de ouro, 6,3 g/t de prata e 1.049 ppm de molibdênio, equivalente a 2,52% de CuEq. A Cascadia afirmou que os resultados mais recentes continuam a expandir a mineralização na Zona 2000S além dos limites do Recurso Mineral atual e destacam a natureza de maior teor da extensão. Os intervalos de perfuração relatados representam espessuras perfuradas, com larguras verdadeiras estimadas em aproximadamente 60–70%. Os resultados mais recentes de expansão indicam que a mineralização de cobre-ouro na Zona 2000S se estende além dos limites do atual Recurso Mineral de Carmacks. Os intervalos amplos e as zonas internas de maior teor poderiam apoiar uma futura expansão do recurso se perfurações adicionais confirmarem a continuidade. No entanto, as novas interseções ainda não foram incorporadas a uma Estimativa de Recurso Mineral atualizada, o que significa que seu impacto final na escala do projeto e no planejamento da mina ainda está por ser determinado.
02 Oct 2026 15:27 (GMT+8)