[SMM Analysis] South Korea’s Lithium Market Sees Gradual Recovery in Procurement Activity Through July

Published: Aug 21, 2026 17:18
South Korea’s lithium market gradually regained momentum through July as the June–July price correction encouraged buyers to reassess procurement. Lithium carbonate drew growing interest from LFP, ESS and conversion demand, while lithium hydroxide improved around selected high-nickel projects. H2 demand will increasingly depend on actual production ramp-ups.

South Korea’s lithium market gradually moved away from the cautious procurement stance seen at the beginning of 2026, with market activity improving through July. New purchases remained limited in H1 amid uncertainty in EV demand and relatively low operating rates across the domestic ternary materials sector. However, production and shipments at some materials and battery companies improved from Q2, while H2 plans for ESS and LFP production became more concrete.
The recovery has varied by product. Lithium carbonate has attracted growing interest from LFP, ESS and conversion-related demand, while lithium hydroxide has improved more selectively around high-nickel customers and projects. This suggests that the Korean lithium market is moving toward a more diversified demand structure rather than experiencing a uniform recovery.

 

Prices Correct After May Rally, Bringing Buyers Back to the Market

According to SMM, lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide CIF South Korea prices remained relatively stable through March and April before rising rapidly in May. Momentum subsequently weakened, with a clearer correction emerging from late June. By July, both products had moved below their previous peaks.

The correction also changed procurement behavior. During the rapid price increase, buyers remained cautious as they balanced the risk of further gains against higher sourcing costs. As prices eased from late June, some companies preparing for H2 production began reassessing required volumes and procurement timing.
Large-scale inventory building has yet to emerge. Purchases remain largely staged and tied to actual production schedules and existing inventories. The shift through July therefore reflects a gradual normalization of procurement activity rather than aggressive restocking.

 

Lithium Carbonate Gains Support From LFP, ESS and Conversion Demand

Procurement interest in lithium carbonate strengthened relatively quickly in July. Demand had remained limited earlier in the year as domestic LFP production was still at an early stage. Heading into H2, however, preparations for LFP cathode production and LFP-based ESS batteries have become more concrete, increasing interest in securing feedstock.
Lithium processors using carbonate as feedstock for hydroxide conversion have also provided an additional source of demand. As a result, the buyer base for lithium carbonate in South Korea is gradually broadening beyond conventional cathode applications.
Given the still-limited scale of domestic LFP production, large-volume procurement is unlikely to emerge immediately. Purchases are more likely to remain gradual and closely linked to production schedules. Nevertheless, the recent price correction has reduced sourcing pressure and provided buyers with a more favorable window to prepare for H2 requirements.

 

Lithium Hydroxide Improves, Led by Selected High-Nickel Projects

The lithium hydroxide market has also improved from Q1 levels. Purchases and cargo pick-ups by some customers increased from Q2, while selected high-nickel cathode and new cylindrical battery projects provided support to demand.
The procurement structure, however, remains different from that of lithium carbonate. Major high-nickel materials and battery producers secure a substantial share of requirements through existing long-term contracts, limiting the need for additional spot purchases even when production increases.
Cross-border flows also became more active in June, including higher lithium hydroxide shipments from China to South Korea. Monthly trade volumes, however, reflect contract shipment schedules, inventory movements and customer qualification as well as end-use demand. They are therefore better viewed as an indication of more active procurement and logistics rather than a direct measure of domestic consumption.
Going forward, demand growth is likely to remain concentrated among customers and projects with actual production ramp-ups, rather than expanding evenly across the market.

 

Materials and Cell-Maker Results Point to a Broader Demand Mix

H1 results from South Korean battery materials companies also showed a widening gap between customers and product segments. Some producers benefited from higher shipments to selected customers and new cylindrical battery projects, while others saw more limited volume growth due to adjustments in EV production plans.
This suggests that operating rates across the domestic ternary materials sector are becoming increasingly dependent on specific customer programs rather than moving in one direction across the industry.
A similar shift is visible among battery cell producers. In addition to conventional EV demand, ESS, data-center UPS and BBU applications, power tools and cylindrical batteries are becoming increasingly important. ESS growth and preparations for domestic LFP production are particularly relevant for future lithium carbonate demand.
At the same time, cylindrical EV batteries and other high-power applications continue to support selected high-nickel products. South Korea’s lithium demand mix is therefore gradually broadening from its traditional EV and high-nickel focus toward a structure in which LFP/ESS and high-performance battery applications coexist.

 

H2 Procurement to Depend More on Actual Production Ramp-Ups

Overall, South Korea’s lithium market became more active through July after a cautious start to the year. Procurement conditions improved as prices corrected from their May highs, while demand sources became increasingly diversified.
Heading into H2, actual production schedules are likely to become more important than short-term price movements in determining procurement activity. The start-up of domestic LFP production, expansion in ESS batteries, new high-nickel customer projects and higher utilization at lithium processing facilities will be key indicators to watch.

January–July 2026 can therefore be viewed as a period in which wait-and-see sentiment gradually eased and procurement activity normalized, while the next phase of demand growth became increasingly linked to specific applications and production ramp-ups.

Data Source Statement: Except for publicly available information, all other data are processed by SMM based on publicly available information, market communication, and relying on SMM's internal database model. They are for reference only and do not constitute decision-making recommendations.

For any inquiries or for more information, please contact: lemonzhao@smm.cn
For more information on how to access our research reports, please contact:service.en@smm.cn
Related News
China’s imports of unwrought cobalt fell 6% month‑on‑month and exports dropped 38% month‑on‑month in July 2026.
5 mins ago
China’s imports of unwrought cobalt fell 6% month‑on‑month and exports dropped 38% month‑on‑month in July 2026.
Read More
China’s imports of unwrought cobalt fell 6% month‑on‑month and exports dropped 38% month‑on‑month in July 2026.
China’s imports of unwrought cobalt fell 6% month‑on‑month and exports dropped 38% month‑on‑month in July 2026.
In July 2026, China’s imports of unwrought cobalt stood at around 1,055 tonnes, down 6% month‑on‑month but up 83% year‑on‑year. By source country, the top three import origins for cobalt metal in July were Indonesia, Russia and Canada, with import volumes of 403 tonnes, 271 tonnes and 175 tonnes respectively. In terms of trade modes, goods under customs special supervision zones accounted for approximately 795 tonnes, representing about 75% of July imports. These supplies mainly flowed into bonded warehouses in Zhejiang and Shanghai. Only roughly 259 tonnes entered domestic consumption channels via general trade. Bonded warehouses show obvious “reservoir” characteristics, leading to a certain divergence between import figures and real domestic demand. For import prices, China’s average import price of unwrought cobalt reached USD 59,296 per tonne in July 2026, rising 13.53% month‑on‑month. Cumulative imports from January to July 2026 totalled 8,763 tonnes, surging 113% year‑on‑year. On the export side, China exported about 313 tonnes of unwrought cobalt in July 2026, falling 38% month‑on‑month and 68% year‑on‑year. By destination, the top three export markets were the Netherlands, the United States and Japan, with shipments of 83 tonnes, 71 tonnes and 49 tonnes respectively. Nearly 95% of monthly exports were goods under customs special supervision zones, dominated by re‑export flows among bonded areas. The average export price of unwrought cobalt stood at USD 56,505 per tonne in July 2026, down 5.16% month‑on‑month. Cumulative exports for January‑July 2026 amounted to 2,977 tonnes, dropping 76% year‑on‑year.
5 mins ago
China's imports of cobalt hydrometallurgical intermediates rose 48% month‑on‑month in July 2026.
33 mins ago
China's imports of cobalt hydrometallurgical intermediates rose 48% month‑on‑month in July 2026.
Read More
China's imports of cobalt hydrometallurgical intermediates rose 48% month‑on‑month in July 2026.
China's imports of cobalt hydrometallurgical intermediates rose 48% month‑on‑month in July 2026.
In July 2026, China’s imports of cobalt hydrometallurgical intermediates stood at approximately 16,174 physical tonnes, up 48% month‑on‑month and 17% year‑on‑year. Of the total volume, imports from the Democratic Republic of the Congo reached around 15,970 physical tonnes, rising 48% month‑on‑month and 21% year‑on‑year. The average import price for cobalt hydrometallurgical intermediates in July 2026 was USD 17,915 per physical tonne, climbing 9.56% month‑on‑month. Around 10,046 physical tonnes of DRC‑sourced intermediates entered Zhejiang and Guangdong provinces via goods under customs special supervision zones, accounting for 62.9% of total imports. General‑trade imports totalled about 4,243 physical tonnes (26.6%), while processing with imported materials stood at roughly 1,681 physical tonnes (10.5%). In addition, China imported a combined 204 physical tonnes of intermediates from Russia and Zambia under general trade during the month.
33 mins ago
Russia became China's largest importer of trucks in July this year
37 mins ago
Russia became China's largest importer of trucks in July this year
Read More
Russia became China's largest importer of trucks in July this year
Russia became China's largest importer of trucks in July this year
On August 20, according to data from the General Administration of Customs of China, Russia ranked first among China’s major truck‑importing countries in July this year, with its import value rising nearly 20% month‑on‑month. Besides Russia, Mexico and Vietnam were China’s top three truck‑importing countries, registering import values of USD 110.5 million and USD 103.3 million respectively.
37 mins ago
Register to Continue Reading
Gain access to the latest insights in metals and new energy
Already have an account?Sign in here
[SMM Analysis] South Korea’s Lithium Market Sees Gradual Recovery in Procurement Activity Through July - Shanghai Metals Market (SMM)