[SMM Analysis] LFP Material Demand Continued to Rise in July, with Supply-Demand Imbalance Emerging in the Industry Chain

Published: Jul 31, 2026 18:47
[SMM Analysis] The demand along the LFP industry chain continues to rise, but the response from the supply side is significantly lagging. The most notable feature of the current market is that supply tightness is rapidly transmitting from the bottom up, forming a cascading inversion of "battery cell production schedule > LFP cathode production schedule > iron phosphate production schedule," with the slow release of LFP capacity and the iron phosphate industry segment having become the most prominent bottleneck in the entire chain.

Since July, demand across the LFP industry chain has continued to rise, but the supply-side response has lagged. The most notable feature of the current market is that tight supply is rapidly transmitting from downstream to upstream, forming a cascading inversion of “battery cell production schedules > LFP cathode production schedules > iron phosphate production schedules”, where slow LFP capacity release and iron phosphate nearing full production have become the most prominent bottlenecks for the entire chain.

I. LFP Cathode: Robust Demand Encounters Capacity Ceiling

In July, LFP cathode production reached 538,000 mt, up 7% MoM, basically flat with the previous month’s expectations. Demand growth mainly came from two sources: power battery orders driven by accelerating commercial vehicle electrification, and stable, continuous releases from the ESS sector.

Entering August, production schedules from cathode plants total approximately 565,000 mt, up 5.1% MoM, with the growth rate slowing compared to July. The core logic behind the slowdown is not weakening demand, but rather that effective capacity has hit its ceiling. Leading cathode plants generally report that currently received orders far exceed their actual delivery capacity, with enterprises mostly in a passive destocking state and inventory available for sale continuously being compressed.Meanwhile, new production lines are in the early stages of equipment commissioning and ramp-up after commissioning, with the pace of release far slower than planned expectations, making it difficult to form effective replenishment in the short term. It can be said that the constrained growth in August is essentially due to “insufficient capacity, rather than insufficient orders.”

Operating rate data intuitively confirms this judgment. The overall operating rate for the LFP industry reached 78% in July and is expected to rise to 80% in August. It is important to note that there is a considerable amount of tail-end capacity in the industry. These production lines struggle to secure downstream bulk orders due to insufficient technical capabilities, poor product consistency, or lack of client certification, and in fact remain idle or operate inefficiently for a long time. Therefore, after eliminating these ineffective capacities, the 80% operating rate already corresponds exactly to a state of full production for deliverable effective capacity. High-quality production lines are almost all operating at full capacity, and marginal new supply is extremely limited. The supply rigidity of the LFP cathode is now clear.

II. Upstream Iron Phosphate: Gap Widens, Becoming the Key Bottleneck Constraining the Entire Chain

The crux of the issue is that the tight landscape is not limited to the LFP cathode but is further spreading to upstream iron phosphate.

In July, LFP cathode production schedules increased by about 7% MoM, and in August, they are increasing by about 5% MoM, but upstream iron phosphate material only increased by about 3.6% MoM and 3% MoM, respectively. The mismatch in supply-demand growth rates directly leads to some LFP cathode plants limiting their production schedules due to the inability to purchase sufficient iron phosphate. Some enterprises are even diverting orders to other process routes or to other cathode plants with surplus iron phosphate supply. This means that the effective supply of iron phosphate has a certain impact on LFP cathode shipments.

This supply-demand gap ultimately manifests as an “inversion” across the entire industry chain: battery cell enterprise production schedules exceed LFP cathode production schedules, and LFP cathode production schedules in turn exceed iron phosphate production schedules, with each link in a state of tight balance or even shortage, and iron phosphate is the weakest link in this inversion chain. The iron phosphate segment also faces a predicament of slow progress in new capacity construction and insufficient effective capacity, and amid persistent inflows of LFP demand, the supply gap continues to widen.

III. Outlook: Peak Season Growth Is Certain, Supply Constraints Difficult to Fundamentally Alleviate

Looking ahead, LFP cathode production schedules are still expected to see about a 5% MoM growth in August. The market will enter the traditional “September-October peak season” for auto sales, providing certain support for power demand, while some new capacities are expected to come online and start ramping up production. However, due to the objective cycle from commissioning to stable mass production for new lines, actual output in September will still be constrained by the capacity ramp-up pace, and supply elasticity is extremely low. Order demand as reported by enterprises remains very robust, and the undersupply situation is highly likely to continue.

Against the backdrop of unresolved supply constraints and continued demand rise, industry chain profits will continue to concentrate in upstream tight segments.Whether iron phosphate supply can be released as scheduled will become the core variable determining the upper limit of LFP cathode production and the direction of processing fees in Q3 and Q4. Meanwhile, there is a need to continuously monitor lithium carbonate price fluctuations and procurement strategy adjustments by downstream leading battery plants. These factors will further influence market pace against the tight supply-demand backdrop.

 

SMM New Energy Research Team

Wang Cong 021-51666838

Feng Disheng 021-51666714

Yang Chaoxing 021-20707860

Wang Zihan 021-51666914

Wang Jie 021-51595902

Chen Bolin 021-51666836

Wang Yizhou 021-51595909

Xu Mengqi 021-20707868

Hu Xuejie 021-20707858

Lin Ziya 021-51666902

Yang Le 021-51595898

Li Yisha 021-51666730

Wang Zhaoyu 021-51666827

Xiao Wenhao 021-51666872

Zhang Jing 021-51666878

Data Source Statement: Except for publicly available information, all other data are processed by SMM based on publicly available information, market communication, and relying on SMM's internal database model. They are for reference only and do not constitute decision-making recommendations.

For any inquiries or for more information, please contact: lemonzhao@smm.cn
For more information on how to access our research reports, please contact:service.en@smm.cn
Related News
[SMM Analysis] Korea’s Battery Downstream Market: Diverging Trends Between NEV Recovery and Weak Cell Production
1 hour ago
[SMM Analysis] Korea’s Battery Downstream Market: Diverging Trends Between NEV Recovery and Weak Cell Production
Read More
[SMM Analysis] Korea’s Battery Downstream Market: Diverging Trends Between NEV Recovery and Weak Cell Production
[SMM Analysis] Korea’s Battery Downstream Market: Diverging Trends Between NEV Recovery and Weak Cell Production
In H1 2026, South Korea’s NEV sales and exports posted double-digit growth, while domestic battery output declined. BEV sales rebounded from a low base, but export growth was led by hybrids, limiting the impact on large-format battery and NCM demand. NCM cell output continued to fall, while LFP capacity expanded. LFP-based ESS is emerging as a new growth driver, but remains too small to offset the NCM decline.
1 hour ago
[MIIT Green Industry Plan (15th FYP)]
1 hour ago
[MIIT Green Industry Plan (15th FYP)]
Read More
[MIIT Green Industry Plan (15th FYP)]
[MIIT Green Industry Plan (15th FYP)]
The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) has issued the 15th Five‑Year Plan for Green and Low‑Carbon Industrial Development, which calls for consolidating and upgrading green competitive industries. It accelerates technological iteration and scenario expansion in key sectors such as new energy vehicles (NEVs), new energy equipment, and new‑type energy storage. It promotes innovative applications of next‑generation power batteries, automotive‑grade chips, and automotive operating systems, and expands the deployment of heavy‑duty NEV trucks in scenarios including trunk line transport, short‑and‑medium‑haul logistics, urban construction, and mining and port operations. It substantially increases the share of green electricity used in polysilicon production, breaks through design and manufacturing technologies for highly reliable wind turbines in desert‑Gobi‑wasteland, high‑altitude, and deep‑sea environments, and promotes the integrated application of wind‑solar‑storage equipment tailored to local conditions. It accelerates the development of large‑capacity, high‑safety, all‑climate, long‑life lithium‑battery products, extends high‑performance lithium batteries to applications in low‑altitude equipment, intelligent robots, electric vessels, electric construction machinery, and new‑energy agricultural machinery, and expands new‑type energy storage applications in areas such as coordinated power supply operation and grid stability support.
1 hour ago
【SMM analysis】 Lestored LFP vs. Hydrometallurgical Recycling: The 2026 Battle for Battery Waste Supremacy
1 hour ago
【SMM analysis】 Lestored LFP vs. Hydrometallurgical Recycling: The 2026 Battle for Battery Waste Supremacy
Read More
【SMM analysis】 Lestored LFP vs. Hydrometallurgical Recycling: The 2026 Battle for Battery Waste Supremacy
【SMM analysis】 Lestored LFP vs. Hydrometallurgical Recycling: The 2026 Battle for Battery Waste Supremacy
In 2026, as restored lithium iron phosphate (LFP) capacity expands from 150,000–160,000 tons to 170,000–180,000 tons, traditional hydrometallurgical LFP recycling companies are facing a wave of profit and competitive landscape reshaping driven by rivalry between different technological routes.
1 hour ago