June China Phosphate Ore Imports Increase MoM, Egyptian Supply Share Plummets, Jordan and Morocco Alternative Supplies Surge [SMM Analysis]

Published: Jul 20, 2026 14:37
[SMM Analysis: China's Phosphate Ore Imports Increased MoM in June; Egypt's Share Plunged as Substitute Supplies from Jordan, Morocco, etc. Surged] July 20, 2026, sourced from customs data. In June 2026, China's phosphate ore imports were 137,000 mt, edging up 4.5% MoM from 131,000 mt in May. Total import value was $12.567 million, up 2.8% MoM. The average import unit price was $91.5/mt, edging down 1.7% from $93.0/mt in May.
SMM July 20 News:

Highlights: On July 20, 2026, based on customs data, China's phosphate ore imports in June 2026 were 137,000 mt, up 4.5% MoM from 131,000 mt in May. Total import value was $12.567 million, up 2.8% MoM. The average import unit price was $91.5/mt, down 1.7% from $93.0/mt in May.

1. Review of Phosphate Ore Imports and Exports in May
In May 2026, China's phosphate ore imports were 131,000 mt, down 36.4% MoM; total import value was $12.226 million, down 38.1% MoM; the average import unit price was $93.0/mt, down 2.6% MoM. Source countries were highly concentrated in Egypt: imports from Egypt were 128,000 mt (up 31.7% MoM), accounting for 97.7% of total imports; no imports from Peru or Jordan in the month. Key background: On May 13, Egypt's Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources announced it would no longer sign any new phosphate ore export contracts, driving a transition from raw material exports to the manufacturing of high-value-added products such as phosphate fertilisers. Impacted by this policy tightening signal, the Egyptian import unit price rose 14.1% to $93.0/mt in May, with CFR prices (26–27% grade) quoted at $95–100/mt.
Provincial patterns shifted dramatically: Guangxi jumped to first place with 78,000 mt (up 65.9% MoM); Hubei, which led with 157,000 mt in April, saw its May imports drop to zero (down 100% MoM); Shandong imported 3,000 mt (up 171.2% MoM), Zhejiang 1,000 mt, and other provinces together imported 50,000 mt (up 3,602.2% MoM), further diversifying import channels.
On the export side, May exports were 32,000 mt, up 189.6% MoM. Hubei exported 21,000 mt (no exports in April), Fujian 6,000 mt (down 40.6% MoM), and Guizhou 5,000 mt (no exports in April), with provinces such as Hubei and Guizhou seeing a full recovery in exports.
2. Analysis of Phosphate Ore Imports and Exports in June

1. Phosphate Ore Imports: Modest Volume Growth, Unit Price Pulls Back Slightly
In June 2026, China's phosphate ore imports were 137,000 mt, up 4.5% MoM from 131,000 mt in May. Total import value was $12.567 million, up 2.8% MoM. The average import unit price was $91.5/mt, down 1.7% from $93.0/mt in May. The slight rebound in imports combined with a simultaneous pullback in unit prices reflected that the market entered a transitional phase of "compensating price with volume and switching source countries" after Egypt's policy shock in May.


2. Phosphate Ore Imports: Drastic Restructuring of Source Country Patterns, Egypt's Share Plunges to 61%, Jordan/Morocco/Kazakhstan Take Over with Volume Growth
The single‑dominant‑country import structure in May was drastically restructured in June. Imports from Egypt fell from 128,000 mt in May to 84,000 mt, plummeting 34.7% MoM, but it remained the top source country; its share of the total plunged from 97.7% in May to around 61%, indicating that the policy effect of Egypt's May 13 announcement to stop signing new phosphate ore export contracts has begun to be materially transmitted.

Imports from Jordan surged from an extremely low base (about 1 mt) in May to 48,000 mt, a MoM increase of tens of thousands of times, jumping to second place; the import unit price was $95/mt, down 91.7% MoM from May (mainly due to the base effect from the previously high unit price). Jordanian supply, mainly medium-grade with stable prices, became the core alternative source to offset the Egyptian shortfall this month.

Pakistan imported 6,000 mt, up 71.6% MoM, with import unit price edging down, maintaining stable supply as a nearby South Asian source. Other countries including Morocco, Kazakhstan, Peru, and Lebanon together imported about 2,000 mt; Morocco's import unit price was as high as $5,050/mt, and Kazakhstan's $2,895.2/mt, affected by high-grade scarce ores, with unit prices significantly higher than mainstream supply.

In terms of import value, of June’s total $12.567 million, Egypt's share dropped significantly (about $7.7 million, approximately 61%), Jordan accounted for about $4.54 million, and Pakistan, Morocco and others together represented a limited share. The divergence between the overall 2.8% MoM value growth and 4.5% MoM volume growth further confirmed the structural decline in the average price driven by Egypt’s reduced share.

3. Phosphate Ore Imports: Provincial Patterns Shift Again, Guangxi Remains Top, Zhejiang Surges 89-fold

The provincial import structure in June continued the drastic adjustments seen since May. Guangxi remained the top importing province with 84,000 mt , up 6.7% MoM, with import value of $7.508 million (up 6.8% MoM), sustaining its traditional advantage in handling North African and Middle Eastern supplies such as those from Egypt and Jordan. Zhejiang imported 48,000 mt, a staggering 8,884.7% (about 89-fold) surge from 500 mt in May, with import value of $4.543 million, up 9,546.4% MoM, jumping to second place, reflecting that Yangtze River Delta importers rapidly switched to alternative sources such as Jordan after the policy shock in May, significantly outpacing the channel-switching speed of other provinces. Hubei, after zero imports in May, resumed some imports in June, with an import unit price of $389.5/mt, markedly above the national average, reflecting characteristics of high-grade scarce supply. Beijing’s import unit price of $934.5/mt ranked the highest nationwide, mainly for high-grade small-lot procurement. Shandong, Shanghai and other provinces maintained stable small-lot imports. Yunnan had no imports in June, down 100% MoM, indicating notable regional structural adjustments.
Import unit prices, Guangxi’s price in June held steady in the $89-90/mt range, mainstream inter-provincial supply in Zhejiang was around $95/mt, broadly in line with the nationwide average price of $91.5/mt; high-price provinces such as Beijing and Hubei saw unit prices pushed up by small-lot high-grade purchases, without materially driving up the national average.


The import province mix underwent dramatic change in May.Guangxi surged to the top with 78,000 mt of imports, up 65.9% MoM; while Hubei, which led in April with 157,000 mt, saw May imports drop to zero, a 100% MoM decline. Shandong imported 3,000 mt, up 171.2% MoM; Zhejiang imported 1,000 mt. Other provinces combined imported 50,000 mt, surging 3,602.2% MoM, reflecting further diversification of import channels.
Import value, Guangxi $7.032 million (MoM +84.5%), other provinces $4.896 million (MoM +3,936.7%), Shandong $249,000 (MoM +167.6%), Zhejiang $47,000.
Import unit prices, Guangxi’s May price was $89.8/mt, up 11.2% from April; others were $98.1/mt, up 9.0% MoM; Shandong was $93.6/mt.
4. Phosphate Ore Exports: 51,000 mt Surge 58.3% MoM, Yunnan and Fujian Lead
In June 2026,China’s phosphate ore exports totaled 51,000 mt, a sharp 58.3% MoM increase from 32,000 mt in May,extending the trend of continuous volume expansion since April.
By export province, Yunnan jumped to first place with 34,000 mt (no exports in May), contributing the bulk of the growth, reflecting the concentrated delivery of prior export orders by industry leaders such as Yunnan Phosphate Chemical Group and Yuntianhua. Fujian exported 17,000 mt, up 158.5% MoM from 6,000 mt in May, maintaining the steady export pace seen from February to May. Guizhou and Hubei had no exports in June, resulting in a new regional structure where “Yunnan takes over and Hubei exits.”
Export Surge Background: Driven by heightened domestic winter stockpiling expectations for phosphate ore (traditional winter stockpiling starts from October to November) and concentrated demand release for iron phosphate in the new energy industry chain, China’s phosphate ore supply-demand balance tightened temporarily. The concentrated export release in June was mainly fueled by prior order deliveries; attention should be paid to changes in the Q3 export pace.

III. Market Outlook
The phosphate ore import market in June exhibited four major features:First, total volumes saw a slight rebound, edging up only 4.5% MoM after the deep pit created by Egypt’s policy shock in May, with the import recovery pace lagging market expectations.

Second, the source country mix underwent dramatic restructuring, with Egypt’s share plunging from 97.7% to about 61%, and alternative origins like Jordan, Pakistan, and Morocco starting to ramp up but still unable to fully offset the gap.

Third, the provincial mix accelerated its shift, with Guangxi firmly at the top, Zhejiang surging 89 times, and Hubei resuming high-price imports—moving the regional channel pattern into a “rebuilding” phase.

Fourth, the export side saw concentrated volume release, led by Yunnan and Fujian, reflecting a temporarily tight domestic supply-demand balance.

Looking ahead to Q3,the impact of Egypt’s halt on new export contracts will continue to unfold—July-August imports could stay in the 130,000-150,000 mt range, with import unit prices moving sideways at $90-100/mt.Three key points to watch:first, the supply stability and grade structure of alternative sources like Jordan and Morocco; second, how the pace of peak-season demand for domestic ammonium phosphate/iron phosphate materializes and stimulates import demand; and third, changes in export policies and customs clearance timing before and after the winter stockpiling season (October-November).

The average Q3 import price is expected tohover within the $90-100/mtrange. As domestic winter stockpiling demand materializes in Q4, imports will surge again, with the price midpoint likely shifting up to$95-105/mt.

 

Note: Should you have any supplements to the details mentioned in this article or concerns regarding phosphorus chemicals (phosphate ore, iron phosphate, LFP, etc.) and solid-state batteries, please feel free to contact us. Contact details:

Tel: 021-20707860 (or WeChat: 13585549799), Yang Chaoxing. Thank you!

Data Source Statement: Except for publicly available information, all other data are processed by SMM based on publicly available information, market communication, and relying on SMM's internal database model. They are for reference only and do not constitute decision-making recommendations.

Images in this article contain AI-translated captions for reference only.

For any inquiries or for more information, please contact: lemonzhao@smm.cn
For more information on how to access our research reports, please contact:service.en@smm.cn
Related News
[SMM Flash] Zimbabwean Spodumene Concentrate Prices Fall Across All Grades, Led by 5% Li₂O Down 1.99%
44 mins ago
[SMM Flash] Zimbabwean Spodumene Concentrate Prices Fall Across All Grades, Led by 5% Li₂O Down 1.99%
Read More
[SMM Flash] Zimbabwean Spodumene Concentrate Prices Fall Across All Grades, Led by 5% Li₂O Down 1.99%
[SMM Flash] Zimbabwean Spodumene Concentrate Prices Fall Across All Grades, Led by 5% Li₂O Down 1.99%
Zimbabwean spodumene concentrate prices, CIF Chinese main ports, declined across all three tracked grades on August 7, with the lower-grade material posting the steepest percentage drop. The 6% Li₂O grade (SMM-Li-SC-005) settled at $2,010/tonne, down $25 (-1.23%), trading in a $1,970-$2,050 range. The 5.5% Li₂O grade (SMM-Li-SC-006) closed at $1,885/tonne, down $30 (-1.57%), within a $1,860-$1,910 band. The 5% Li₂O grade (SMM-Li-SC-007) fell hardest, settling at $1,725/tonne, down $35 (-1.99%), with the widest daily range of the three at $1,660-$1,790. The pullback widened the grade differential at the lower end of the curve: the 6%-5.5% spread stood at $125/tonne, while the 5.5%-5% spread widened to $160/tonne, up from typical spread levels, pointing to comparatively softer demand for lower-grade Zimbabwean material relative to higher-Li₂O concentrate on the day. SMM View: The broad-based decline across all three Zimbabwean spodumene grades tracks the wider softness in China's lithium chemical complex, with lower-grade material bearing the brunt of the pullback as buyers favour higher-grade feedstock amid cautious purchasing. SMM will continue to monitor whether the widening 5.5%-5% spread persists into the next pricing session or reflects a single-day liquidity effect.
44 mins ago
[SMM Analysis] Corica Mali Wins $348M Open-Pit Mining Contract at Ganfeng's Goulamina Lithium Project
47 mins ago
[SMM Analysis] Corica Mali Wins $348M Open-Pit Mining Contract at Ganfeng's Goulamina Lithium Project
Read More
[SMM Analysis] Corica Mali Wins $348M Open-Pit Mining Contract at Ganfeng's Goulamina Lithium Project
[SMM Analysis] Corica Mali Wins $348M Open-Pit Mining Contract at Ganfeng's Goulamina Lithium Project
Corica Mali, a subsidiary of Corica Mining Services, has been awarded the open-pit mining services contract at the Goulamina spodumene project in Mali, valued at approximately $348 million. The contract follows a competitive tender process and covers six months of pre-production activity followed by a fixed five-year term. Corica has already mobilised to site under an early works arrangement and is currently carrying out pre-strip and direct shipped ore (DSO) mining and crushing. Scope covers grade control, drill and blast, load and haul, and plant ore-feed services, with a planned material movement target of 18-20 Mt/y over the contract term. This figure refers to total mined material (ore plus waste), distinct from finished spodumene concentrate output Goulamina's Stage 1 definitive feasibility study outlines nameplate production of roughly 506,000 tonnes per annum of 6% Li₂O spodumene concentrate (SC6), with test work validating high-quality, low mica concentrate. On logistics, Goulamina is landlocked, located roughly 50 km west of Bougouni in southern Mali, and spodumene concentrate produced at site is trucked overland to coastal ports for onward shipment to end markets, predominantly Chinese converters. Industry practice for landlocked West African spodumene projects is to sell concentrate on an FOB basis at the export port, with the buyer arranging and bearing ocean freight from that point; Mali-origin concentrate has historically moved primarily via Abidjan, with San Pedro and Dakar available as secondary corridors. Specific Incoterms and export routing for Goulamina's commercial shipments were not disclosed in the contract announcement and should be confirmed against offtake documentation rather than assumed. Goulamina holds all key approvals and permits required for production. Ownership has changed since the original mining contract announcement: Ganfeng Lithium, previously a 50% joint-venture partner, acquired the remaining 40% interest from Leo Lithium in a transaction completed through 2024-2025, and now holds the project alongside the Government of Mali's equity interest under the country's revised mining code terms of the state's current stake should be verified against the latest Malian government disclosure rather than the original 10% free-carry figure cited at contract signing. First commercial shipment from Goulamina occurred in August 2025, superseding the original H1 2024 production target referenced when this contract was first announced. Corica has operated in the West African mining services sector for over 20 years and reports more than 2,000 employees, according to company-supplied figures; these have not been independently verified by SMM. SMM View: The Corica contract underlines the scale of open-pit mining services demand accompanying Mali's ramp-up as a spodumene supply source, with an 18-20 Mt/y material movement target supporting Goulamina's roughly 506,000 tpa SC6 nameplate capacity. With Ganfeng now holding full private ownership following its 2024-2025 buyout of Leo Lithium's stake, offtake and logistics decisions at Goulamina sit entirely with Ganfeng and the Malian state, reinforcing China's direct control over a growing share of West African spodumene supply reaching Chinese conversion capacity. SMM will monitor further disclosure on Goulamina's export routing and contractual Incoterms as shipment volumes scale.
47 mins ago
[SMM Analysis] Zimbabwe Lithium Producers Commit $1.45B to Local Processing, Seek Export Ban Flexibility"
54 mins ago
[SMM Analysis] Zimbabwe Lithium Producers Commit $1.45B to Local Processing, Seek Export Ban Flexibility"
Read More
[SMM Analysis] Zimbabwe Lithium Producers Commit $1.45B to Local Processing, Seek Export Ban Flexibility"
[SMM Analysis] Zimbabwe Lithium Producers Commit $1.45B to Local Processing, Seek Export Ban Flexibility"
Zimbabwe's lithium producers have collectively committed approximately US$1.45 billion to local beneficiation infrastructure, according to Lithium Producers Association Chairman Innocent Rukweza, who also heads Mutapa Energy Resources. Speaking at the Mine Entra Beneficiation and Value Addition Symposium in Bulawayo, Rukweza said the industry has sought government flexibility on the pending export restriction on unbeneficiated spodumene concentrate, citing limited sulphate-plant readiness across the sector. SMM notes the ban's effective date and any adjustment to it should be confirmed against the latest government notice rather than symposium commentary, and that the US$1.45 billion figure is association-reported and has not been independently verified. Of seven major producers, only the Huayou-linked plant at Prospect Lithium Zimbabwe's Arcadia site has completed and commissioned sulphate conversion capacity to date. The US$400 million facility exported Africa's first locally produced lithium sulphate in April 2026 and is now operating. Sinomine's US$500 million sulphate plant at Bikita remains under construction, Kamativi Mining Company's US$200 million-plus sulphate project is at investment stage with commissioning status unconfirmed, and a fourth, unnamed facility is targeted for end-2027. The gap between committed capital and commissioned output is the operative supply constraint behind the industry's request for timeline flexibility: the remaining producers are still moving concentrate rather than sulphate and would be directly exposed if the unbeneficiated export restriction takes effect before their plants come online. Logistics add a further layer of risk to that timeline. Spodumene concentrate is currently exported CIF China, routed predominantly via Beira in Mozambique and Durban in South Africa, and sulphate output from commissioned and future plants will likely need to move through the same corridors absent dedicated arrangements. ZETDC grid instability continues to affect processing-plant uptime, bearing directly on how quickly the remaining sulphate facilities can ramp to nameplate capacity once commissioned, while congestion at the Machipanda border post and along the Beitbridge Durban and Maputo rail corridors affects turnaround times independent of on-site production readiness. Even where sulphate capacity comes online on schedule, these constraints will shape whether the sector can convert commissioned capacity into consistent export volumes ahead of any tightened concentrate-export policy. On the fiscal side, the industry's effective tax burden is estimated at around 40% of sales revenue, comprising a 10% export tax on unbeneficiated lithium, 7% royalties, a 3% community development levy, a 1% MMCZ marketing fee and 15.5% VAT, before corporate income tax, payroll and foreign currency retention requirements are added. The association has called for a review, noting Zimbabwe's rate sits above global peers. Beyond lithium, the association has pointed to unrecovered value in tantalum, niobium and caesium from lithium operations, and government has since introduced mandatory mineral declaration and on-site assay laboratory requirements at producing mines. Specific loss and investment figures cited for this by-product stream were not independently attributed at the symposium and are not carried here pending primary sourcing. SMM View: Zimbabwe's beneficiation drive is currently a one-plant story, with Arcadia commissioned and exporting sulphate while Bikita, Kamativi and the fourth facility remain at construction or investment stage. The binding constraints on closing that gap are not purely financial grid reliability and corridor congestion at Machipanda and along the Beitbridge–Durban and Maputo routes will shape how quickly commissioned capacity converts into consistent export volumes. The roughly 40% effective tax burden remains a separate and likely more durable point of friction with Harare. SMM will confirm the committed investment figure and current export-policy status once further primary disclosures are available.
54 mins ago
Register to Continue Reading
Gain access to the latest insights in metals and new energy
Already have an account?Sign in here
June China Phosphate Ore Imports Increase MoM, Egyptian Supply Share Plummets, Jordan and Morocco Alternative Supplies Surge [SMM Analysis] - Shanghai Metals Market (SMM)