Goldman Sachs Highlights Tariff Impacts: Some US Industries May Benefit, But More Will Suffer  

Published: Mar 6, 2025 14:39
March 6 (CLSA)  – Goldman Sachs' latest report indicates that US President Trump's recently implemented and proposed tariffs are disrupting US trade relations. The tariff hikes are expected to impact major US industries: some may benefit, but more are likely to suffer.

March 6 (CLSA) – Goldman Sachs' latest report indicates that US President Trump's recently implemented and proposed tariffs are disrupting US trade relations. The tariff hikes are expected to impact major US industries: some may benefit, but more are likely to suffer.

US Manufacturing Will Be Hurt

As of this Tuesday (Eastern Time), Trump's tariffs on products from Canada, Mexico, and China have taken effect. These three countries are the top three trading partners of the US.

Looking ahead, Trump plans to raise tariffs on imported steel and aluminum from 10% to 25% starting March 12 and is expected to implement reciprocal tariff policies beginning April 2. Additionally, he is expected to impose a 25% tariff on EU-manufactured cars and a 10% tariff on key imported products.

Trump has also warned that if US trading partners retaliate, he may impose additional tariffs.

In their analysis report, Goldman Sachs economists led by Jan Hatzius wrote:

"These tariff proposals may help some domestic industries in the US but will harm others... Higher tariffs will increase the prices of imported goods, boosting market demand for some domestically produced goods. However, higher tariffs will also raise production costs for some US producers and may trigger foreign retaliation against US exports, both of which could harm US manufacturing."

Secondary Material Production Industries Hit Hardest

Goldman's analysis examined Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods, as well as the proposed tariffs on steel and aluminum, key imported products, and European cars. They found that while US steel and aluminum producers and oil and natural gas producers stand to benefit the most from the tariffs, downstream manufacturing industries that process these raw materials into finished products will suffer the greatest harm.

Goldman economists wrote: "The biggest beneficiaries are primary steel and aluminum manufacturing and raw material processing industries, while the hardest-hit sectors will be those specializing in secondary material production, such as the manufacturing of steel and aluminum products, petroleum and coal products, and pharmaceutical products."

They added that a 10% tariff on pharmaceuticals and related chemical products "would impose a significant 1% drag on US pharmaceutical manufacturing," as imported end-user pharmaceuticals do not hold a significant market share in the US, yet the US pharmaceutical industry "heavily relies on global intermediate pharmaceutical production and supply."

Goldman noted that tariff hikes on key imported products such as steel and aluminum, oil and natural gas, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals will have a significant impact on US businesses.

Could US Goods Face Boycotts?

Beyond the direct impact of tariffs, Goldman economists also mentioned: "In addition to potential retaliatory tariffs from foreign governments, US producers appear to face some consumer boycotts," citing examples of US products being boycotted during the Iraq War.

They wrote: "While it is difficult to predict how far recent boycotts of US products (e.g., Canadian boycotts of US alcohol, European boycotts of US cars) will go, past experience suggests limited impact. We estimate that since early February, the impact on US exports from such boycotts has been only -0.1%."

Goldman estimated that, in terms of data, the net impact of Trump's tariff proposals through the production channel appears relatively small: a drag of -0.2% on US industrial output, -0.04% on GDP, and minimal impact on most industries.

However, "While the net impact through the production channel is small, we expect greater effects through other channels, particularly by reducing household real income and tightening financial conditions."

Chinese source: CLS

Translated by SMM

Data Source Statement: Except for publicly available information, all other data are processed by SMM based on publicly available information, market communication, and relying on SMM‘s internal database model. They are for reference only and do not constitute decision-making recommendations.

For any inquiries or to learn more information, please contact: lemonzhao@smm.cn
For more information on how to access our research reports, please contact:service.en@smm.cn
Related News
Fed Governor Milan Pushes for Over 100 Basis Points Cut, Contradicts Barkin on Caution
16 hours ago
Fed Governor Milan Pushes for Over 100 Basis Points Cut, Contradicts Barkin on Caution
Read More
Fed Governor Milan Pushes for Over 100 Basis Points Cut, Contradicts Barkin on Caution
Fed Governor Milan Pushes for Over 100 Basis Points Cut, Contradicts Barkin on Caution
Federal Reserve Governor Milan pointed out that it is necessary for the US Fed to cut interest rates by more than 100 basis points this year. At the same time, he is very much looking forward to the performance of Kevin Warsh as Fed Chairman. However, Richmond Fed President Barkin emphasized that monetary policy must remain cautious until inflation fully pulls back to the target level, thereby ensuring the stability of the labour market.
16 hours ago
Democratic Senators Demand Delay in Fed Nomination Amid Criminal Investigation
16 hours ago
Democratic Senators Demand Delay in Fed Nomination Amid Criminal Investigation
Read More
Democratic Senators Demand Delay in Fed Nomination Amid Criminal Investigation
Democratic Senators Demand Delay in Fed Nomination Amid Criminal Investigation
All 11 Democratic members of the US Senate Banking Committee jointly sent a letter to the committee's chairman, Tim Scott, requesting that all nomination processes for the prospective Fed Chairman, Kevin Warsh, be postponed until the criminal investigation into current Fed Chairman Powell and other board members is concluded. However, Scott stated that Warsh's confirmation was a done deal.
16 hours ago
Fed to Keep Large Banks' Capital Levels Unchanged, Postpones Stress Test Reforms Until 2027
16 hours ago
Fed to Keep Large Banks' Capital Levels Unchanged, Postpones Stress Test Reforms Until 2027
Read More
Fed to Keep Large Banks' Capital Levels Unchanged, Postpones Stress Test Reforms Until 2027
Fed to Keep Large Banks' Capital Levels Unchanged, Postpones Stress Test Reforms Until 2027
The US Fed has announced that it will maintain the capital levels of large banks unchanged during the upcoming stress test cycle (corresponding to the 2026 cycle). At the same time, the US Fed is planning multidimensional reforms to this annual test, aiming to enhance its transparency. The US Fed's Vice Chair for Supervision, Bowman, revealed that adjustments to the stress capital buffer requirements for large banks will be postponed until 2027. This move is intended to provide the US Fed with sufficient time to evaluate potential flaws that may be exposed in its testing models when assessing banks' financial conditions under simulated economic downturn scenarios.
16 hours ago