Tesla may use new technology from Maxwell to produce his own battery

Published: Jun 13, 2019 11:03 (GMT+8)
Source: SMM
Elon Musk suggests or has almost confirmed that Tesla is starting to produce his own batteries, using new technology from Maxwell, which may even mine minerals to produce batteries.

SMM6 13-Elon Musk hinted or has almost confirmed that Tesla is starting to produce his own battery, using new technology from Maxwell, which may even mine minerals to produce batteries.

It is sometimes easy to think that Tesla has produced his own battery because it claims to own the world's largest battery factory, but this is not the case.

At the Gigafactory 1 plant, which is co-owned by Tesla and Panasonic in Nevada, Panasonic has a battery production line at the plant. Tesla bought these batteries from Japanese suppliers to produce battery modules and battery packs in other parts of the same factory

At Tesla's 2019 shareholder meeting, the CEO highlighted the fact that Tesla's product launch is currently limited by the scale of battery production. " As we expand our battery production, we must pay more attention to the supply chain and possibly into the mining industry. I have no idea. At least a little bit, as much as we can, so that we can expand as fast as we can. When it comes to battery production, Tesla, who struck deals directly with mining companies and is increasingly involved in supply chain production, said he did not want too many companies involved in the production of the supply chain.

Straubel, a former chief battery expert at Tesla, added, "We need a solution for mass battery production. However, he did not directly say that he took over battery production, nor did he rely on Panasonic. Tesla's vice president of technology, Drew Baglino, added that they wanted to be" the master of their own destiny "on this issue.

The CEO also briefly referred to the recent integration of battery technology from Maxwell: "We think this is really quite strategic [..], which is a very important technology that has a significant impact on the production of battery components, while reducing the cost and capital required to produce battery components on a large scale.

However, he did not want to comment. More information will be announced at the Battery and Powertrain Investor Day, which Tesla plans to hold at the end of this year.

I think the possibility of Tesla entering the battery production itself is very high.

Musk didn't say directly that he would make his own battery, but they made so many hints that they all confirmed some of their views. The most important time was when he listed two of the most important things: batteries and full autopilot.

Tesla has done it successfully, and it makes perfect sense to build another.

When Musk talked about not letting anyone else in for the time being, Straubel talked about a "large-scale solution for battery production." He was talking about the production of battery components, not batteries. The series of comments by Elon, Straubel and Drew were suspicious, and Strabel looked at him with a strangely nervous smile when Drew said they had "learned a lot from their partners," and now they "have a solution." To me, the smile meant "no, don't say" and didn't want him to say that Tesla would make his own battery components.

If we consider Elon's words about Maxwell, it is clear that Tesla is trying to use his experience to work with Panasonic and start producing his own battery components with technology acquired from Maxwell. This will be a major step forward. Tesla is already the most relevant carmaker in battery production, and if their technology is as good as they hear, it will take their lead to a whole new level.

 

Data Source Statement: Except for publicly available information, all other data are processed by SMM based on publicly available information, market communication, and relying on SMM's internal database model. They are for reference only and do not constitute decision-making recommendations.

For any inquiries or for more information, please contact: lemonzhao@smm.cn
For more information on how to access our research reports, please contact:service.en@smm.cn
Related News
[SMM Chromium Flash] Global Chrome Ore Departures Fall 2.74% WoW to 642,500 mt, Maputo Rebounds
13 hours ago
[SMM Chromium Flash] Global Chrome Ore Departures Fall 2.74% WoW to 642,500 mt, Maputo Rebounds
Read More
[SMM Chromium Flash] Global Chrome Ore Departures Fall 2.74% WoW to 642,500 mt, Maputo Rebounds
[SMM Chromium Flash] Global Chrome Ore Departures Fall 2.74% WoW to 642,500 mt, Maputo Rebounds
Global chrome ore departures totaled 642,500 mt in the week ended October 2, down 2.74% week-on-week, according to SMM's latest data. The modest headline decline masks a significant reshuffling beneath the surface, as a sharp rebound at Maputo was offset by pullbacks at Richards Bay and Mersin. Maputo departures rose to 488,800 mt from 340,200 mt, a 43.68% increase that lifted the port's share of total departures back to roughly 76% from about 51.5% a week earlier, reversing the prior week's shift toward a more distributed export mix. Richards Bay fell to 95,700 mt from 227,800 mt, a 57.99% decline that gave back the bulk of the prior week's rebound, while Mersin eased 31.52% to 58,000 mt from 84,700 mt. Beira again recorded no chrome ore departures, remaining inactive for a fourth consecutive week. The week's data points to a reversion toward the more Maputo-concentrated flow pattern seen through most of August and September, with the prior week's broader distribution across ports proving short-lived. Whether Richards Bay's pullback reflects a one-off after an unusually strong prior week or a return to its more intermittent loading pattern will be worth monitoring in the coming weeks.
13 hours ago
[SMM Chromium Flash] China's High-Carbon Ferrochrome Output Drops 3.17% MoM in September as Cost Inversion Bites
14 hours ago
[SMM Chromium Flash] China's High-Carbon Ferrochrome Output Drops 3.17% MoM in September as Cost Inversion Bites
Read More
[SMM Chromium Flash] China's High-Carbon Ferrochrome Output Drops 3.17% MoM in September as Cost Inversion Bites
[SMM Chromium Flash] China's High-Carbon Ferrochrome Output Drops 3.17% MoM in September as Cost Inversion Bites
SMM data showed that China's high-carbon ferrochrome output in September 2026 fell 3.17% MoM, a wider decline than August's 1.25%. Output remained 18.8% higher YoY, though growth slowed from 20.36% in August. Output for January to September was up 30.84% YoY, compared with 32.56% at the end of August. The slowdown reflects squeezed margins. Firm coke prices, higher power tariffs and slow-moving chrome ore prices raised costs, while lower steel mill tender prices pressured ferrochrome prices, so southern producers, where costs are highest, cut output most. Output in the northern producing region held up better and kept national volumes well above last year, which is why YoY and YTD growth remain strong even as the MoM trend turns down. SMM expects output to ease only slightly from here, with weaker stainless steel demand offset by lower chrome ore costs and fixed long-term contract volumes.
14 hours ago
Liberia survey flags early-stage anomalies across Zodiac licences
14 hours ago
Liberia survey flags early-stage anomalies across Zodiac licences
Read More
Liberia survey flags early-stage anomalies across Zodiac licences
Liberia survey flags early-stage anomalies across Zodiac licences
[SMM Tantalum & Niobium Flash] Zodiac Gold has completed 10,661 soil samples across 530 km² of its Bomi South and Bong West licences in Liberia. National stream-sediment maps place parts of the licence package within the top 0.5% of Liberia’s dataset for 16 elements, including tantalum and niobium. Zodiac’s portable-XRF screening of 2,270 soil samples returned niobium values up to 61 ppm; the release provided no corresponding quantified tantalum soil result. The findings broaden the licences beyond their primary gold focus and identify areas for follow-up mapping and infill sampling. They remain reconnaissance evidence, not a tantalum or niobium discovery: portable-XRF readings are preliminary, most samples have not yet been screened for multiple elements, and no drilling, mineral resource, metallurgy or economic study has established recoverable mineralisation.
14 hours ago