Steel and aluminum tariffs lead to retribution against agriculture in the United States Business organizations have called for the abolition of tariffs

Published: Jan 25, 2019 16:07

In a letter to U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and Trade Representative Robert Leicht, the Commerce and Agriculture Organization called on the government to eliminate metal tariffs so that Canada and Mexico can eliminate tariffs on American goods.

On June 1, 2018, the Trump administration imposed a 25 per cent tariff on steel imports from Canada and Mexico and a 10 per cent tariff on aluminium. The two countries subsequently retaliated against a range of American products, which hit farmers and food companies particularly hard. Mexico, for example, has imposed punitive tariffs of 20 per cent on US pork, causing serious economic losses to US pork producers. According to Dermot Hayes, an economist at the University of Iowa, Mexican tariffs cost producers $12 per animal, meaning the industry loses $1.5 billion a year. Metal tariffs have also hurt US manufacturers dependent on steel and aluminium imports, increasing the cost of US industry and consumer goods.

In the letter, the group said that for many producers, the damage caused by mutual trade disputes between steel and aluminium far outweighed any benefits of the USMCA agreement, the US-Mexico-Canada agreement. The Trump administration should work with Canada and Mexico to quickly resolve the metal issue.

Jim Hamel (Jim Heimerl), president of NPPC, an Ohio pork producer, says metal tariffs undermine the ability of the private sector to lobby through the USMCA agreement. For many industries, these tariffs are a hair-trigger problem that is consuming resources that should have been concentrated through the USMCA agreement.

(note: if copyright issues are involved, please contact SMM and we will deal with "View the original text" in a timely manner)

Scan QR code, apply to join SMM metal exchange group, please indicate company + name + main business

Data Source Statement: Except for publicly available information, all other data are processed by SMM based on publicly available information, market communication, and relying on SMM‘s internal database model. They are for reference only and do not constitute decision-making recommendations.

For any inquiries or to learn more information, please contact: lemonzhao@smm.cn
For more information on how to access our research reports, please contact:service.en@smm.cn
Related News
Fed Governor Milan Pushes for Over 100 Basis Points Cut, Contradicts Barkin on Caution
Feb 7, 2026 17:24
Fed Governor Milan Pushes for Over 100 Basis Points Cut, Contradicts Barkin on Caution
Read More
Fed Governor Milan Pushes for Over 100 Basis Points Cut, Contradicts Barkin on Caution
Fed Governor Milan Pushes for Over 100 Basis Points Cut, Contradicts Barkin on Caution
Federal Reserve Governor Milan pointed out that it is necessary for the US Fed to cut interest rates by more than 100 basis points this year. At the same time, he is very much looking forward to the performance of Kevin Warsh as Fed Chairman. However, Richmond Fed President Barkin emphasized that monetary policy must remain cautious until inflation fully pulls back to the target level, thereby ensuring the stability of the labour market.
Feb 7, 2026 17:24
Democratic Senators Demand Delay in Fed Nomination Amid Criminal Investigation
Feb 7, 2026 17:23
Democratic Senators Demand Delay in Fed Nomination Amid Criminal Investigation
Read More
Democratic Senators Demand Delay in Fed Nomination Amid Criminal Investigation
Democratic Senators Demand Delay in Fed Nomination Amid Criminal Investigation
All 11 Democratic members of the US Senate Banking Committee jointly sent a letter to the committee's chairman, Tim Scott, requesting that all nomination processes for the prospective Fed Chairman, Kevin Warsh, be postponed until the criminal investigation into current Fed Chairman Powell and other board members is concluded. However, Scott stated that Warsh's confirmation was a done deal.
Feb 7, 2026 17:23
Fed to Keep Large Banks' Capital Levels Unchanged, Postpones Stress Test Reforms Until 2027
Feb 7, 2026 17:23
Fed to Keep Large Banks' Capital Levels Unchanged, Postpones Stress Test Reforms Until 2027
Read More
Fed to Keep Large Banks' Capital Levels Unchanged, Postpones Stress Test Reforms Until 2027
Fed to Keep Large Banks' Capital Levels Unchanged, Postpones Stress Test Reforms Until 2027
The US Fed has announced that it will maintain the capital levels of large banks unchanged during the upcoming stress test cycle (corresponding to the 2026 cycle). At the same time, the US Fed is planning multidimensional reforms to this annual test, aiming to enhance its transparency. The US Fed's Vice Chair for Supervision, Bowman, revealed that adjustments to the stress capital buffer requirements for large banks will be postponed until 2027. This move is intended to provide the US Fed with sufficient time to evaluate potential flaws that may be exposed in its testing models when assessing banks' financial conditions under simulated economic downturn scenarios.
Feb 7, 2026 17:23
Steel and aluminum tariffs lead to retribution against agriculture in the United States Business organizations have called for the abolition of tariffs - Shanghai Metals Market (SMM)