Review of the Iron Phosphate Market in H1 2024: Thorny Paths Are Also Scenic

게시됨: Aug 2, 2024 16:50
출처: SMM
According to the SMM survey, China's iron phosphate output in H1 2024 was 705,200 mt, up 42% YoY. Among them, the output of non-integrated producers was 337,7900 mt, accounting for 47.9% of the total output.

According to the SMM survey, China's iron phosphate output in H1 2024 was 705,200 mt, up 42% YoY. Among them, the output of non-integrated producers was 337,7900 mt, accounting for 47.9% of the total output.


1. The supply-demand pattern in H1 2024 was hard to reverse, with prominent losses

From January to February 2024, in preparation for the CNY holiday in January and the planned holiday in February, some iron phosphate producers advanced their February orders, leading to insufficient production momentum in February. Together with the continuous price suppression by downstream LFP producers, many iron phosphate producers were keen to hold their offers firm, resulting in low production enthusiasm. Although iron phosphate producers tried to negotiate better terms, the results were minimal.

From March to April 2024, the NEV price war began, orders increased, and the operating rate of iron phosphate producers rose, leading to increased market supply. However, during the spring plowing season in March, the demand for phosphate fertiliser surged, driving up the price of phosphate sources. The prices of industrial ammonium and phosphoric acid also rose slightly, and the pressure of rising costs gradually transmitted downstream, but the transmission was still obstructed. Iron phosphate prices only increased slightly, and the loss gap remained. Some iron phosphate producers refused low-price orders to reduce losses, resulting in some idle capacity.

In May 2024, the most unexpected event for iron phosphate producers was the sudden rise in industrial ammonium prices due to a shortage of water-soluble fertiliser supply from Xinjiang. Due to the lack of prior stockpiling, the cost of iron phosphate using the ammonium process soared. Together with good downstream demand, iron phosphate producers were keen to hold their offers firm.

In June 2024, the production and supply of iron phosphate producers significantly decreased, affected by downstream production cuts and destocking at the end of the quarter. Iron phosphate producers reduced production due to cost pressures. The prices of industrial ammonium and phosphoric acid remained stable, keeping the cost of iron phosphate high. However, due to obstructed price transmission, the expected significant price increase did not materialize, and June's production was more conservative compared to April and May.

2. Excess supply of iron phosphate, integrated producers reduce costs through external procurement

In H1 2024, except for February when production was reduced or halted due to CNY, leading to negative supply-demand balance, the overall supply in other months was excessive, providing conditions for continuous price competition in iron phosphate. Together with high inventory levels, many iron phosphate producers chose to sell at lower prices to increase orders and clear inventory.

Due to the rising prices of phosphoric acid and industrial ammonium in H1, the costs for integrated producers were also high. This led to an increase in the proportion of external procurement by integrated producers, as the cost of externally procured iron phosphate was lower than self-produced, better coping with the low conversion margin of LFP. However, iron phosphate producers became the lowest in the food chain.

3. Market dynamics are ever-changing, only those involved know the true situation

In the iron phosphate market, Hunan Yuneng and Wanrun, as integrated producers, maintained a leading market share, especially Hunan Yuneng, whose dominant position remained unchallenged. Guizhou Deanda operated flexibly, with iron phosphate products available for both internal use and external sale. Tongling Nanyuan made significant progress in production share in H1. Yuntianhua performed outstandingly in H1, leveraging its advantages. Iron phosphate producers selling externally faced a shrinking market, and it was wise to control production, reduce operating rates, and minimize losses.

Iron phosphate, being specifically designed for LFP, has a single downstream flow. The main downstream product of upstream phosphate sources is agricultural fertiliser, with pricing power mainly in the hands of upstream phosphate chemical companies. This puts iron phosphate producers in a difficult position, squeezed by both upstream and downstream. Although the issue of excess supply is hard to resolve, high-quality products are still in demand.

New entrants in the iron phosphate industry often compete with low prices due to their unstable foundation. However, LFP producers consider both cost and product quality, and new iron phosphate producers or models entering the supply system usually require 3-6 months for validation, a relatively long cycle.

Additionally, in H1 2024, a new force entered the iron phosphate sector, with recycling companies gradually focusing on the treatment of waste iron slag and starting to release recycled iron phosphate capacity. However, the quality of recycled iron phosphate is currently uneven and has not yet stood the test of time.

The competition in the iron phosphate market will remain fierce in H2, and profitability has become a luxury in a loss-making market environment. Many iron phosphate producers are considering production cuts or halts. This is common among phosphate chemical companies with resources, as the iron phosphate business is a "side business" for large phosphate chemical groups. If the "side business" continues to lose money, it is better to focus on the main phosphate chemical business to ensure profitability. However, iron phosphate producers without resource advantages and with a single business focus can only choose to fight to the end, striving to break through and persist.

The industry will gradually move towards concentration, with capacity clearing being brutal. Companies will compete in terms of capital, technology, management, and resources, undergoing long-term tests. In the thorny paths, they will find a way out, and looking back, they will realize that they have overcome numerous challenges.

데이터 출처 설명: 공개 정보를 제외한 모든 데이터는 SMM이 공개 정보, 시장 커뮤니케이션 및 SMM 내부 데이터베이스 모델을 기반으로 가공한 것입니다. 본 자료는 참고용이며 의사결정 권고를 구성하지 않습니다.

문의 사항이 있거나 자세한 정보를 원하시면 아래로 연락해 주시기 바랍니다: lemonzhao@smm.cn
리서치 보고서 열람 방법에 대한 자세한 내용은 아래로 문의하시기 바랍니다:service.en@smm.cn
관련 뉴스
[SMM 플래시 뉴스] 화유코발트: 상반기 삼원계 양극재 전구체 출하량 80,800톤, 전년 동기 대비 약 94% 증가
38분 전
[SMM 플래시 뉴스] 화유코발트: 상반기 삼원계 양극재 전구체 출하량 80,800톤, 전년 동기 대비 약 94% 증가
더 보기
[SMM 플래시 뉴스] 화유코발트: 상반기 삼원계 양극재 전구체 출하량 80,800톤, 전년 동기 대비 약 94% 증가
[SMM 플래시 뉴스] 화유코발트: 상반기 삼원계 양극재 전구체 출하량 80,800톤, 전년 동기 대비 약 94% 증가
[화유코발트: 상반기 삼원계 양극재 전구체 출하량 8만 800톤, 전년 동기 대비 약 94% 증가] 화유코발트는 반기보고서에서 상반기 삼원계 양극재 전구체 출하량이 총 8만 800톤으로 전년 동기 대비 약 94% 증가했다고 밝혔다.
38분 전
33억 위안 이상! 리튬 배터리 분리막 생산 라인 8개 포함! 창저우 밍주의 화남 프로젝트 정착.
1시간 전
33억 위안 이상! 리튬 배터리 분리막 생산 라인 8개 포함! 창저우 밍주의 화남 프로젝트 정착.
더 보기
33억 위안 이상! 리튬 배터리 분리막 생산 라인 8개 포함! 창저우 밍주의 화남 프로젝트 정착.
33억 위안 이상! 리튬 배터리 분리막 생산 라인 8개 포함! 창저우 밍주의 화남 프로젝트 정착.
최근 광둥성 에너지국은 창저우밍주(002108)의 화남 기지 프로젝트에 대한 에너지 절감 보고서 심사를 완료하고 원칙적으로 승인했습니다. 공고에 따르면, 이 프로젝트는 광둥성 쩡청구 셴춘진에 위치하며 총 투자액은 약 33억 7,890만 위안입니다. 리튬 배터리 분리막 및 PE 압력 파이프라인 두 개의 하위 프로젝트로 구성됩니다. 주요 건설 내용은 습식 리튬 배터리 분리막 생산 라인 8개와 PE 압력 파이프라인 생산 라인 6개입니다. 완공 시 연간 PE 압력 파이프라인 3만 톤, 습식 분리막 24억 m² 생산 능력을 갖추게 됩니다. 분리막 하위 프로젝트는 2028년 12월, PE 압력 파이프라인 하위 프로젝트는 2027년 10월 생산 개시 예정입니다.
1시간 전
11.8억 달러 해외 리튬 염호 프로젝트 인수, 돌연 변경! 부동산 상장사의 이종 신에너지 사업 진출에 제동
2시간 전
11.8억 달러 해외 리튬 염호 프로젝트 인수, 돌연 변경! 부동산 상장사의 이종 신에너지 사업 진출에 제동
더 보기
11.8억 달러 해외 리튬 염호 프로젝트 인수, 돌연 변경! 부동산 상장사의 이종 신에너지 사업 진출에 제동
11.8억 달러 해외 리튬 염호 프로젝트 인수, 돌연 변경! 부동산 상장사의 이종 신에너지 사업 진출에 제동
아르헨티나 아리자로 프로젝트는 아리자로 리튬 염호의 광업권 6건을 포함하며, 총 면적 약 205km²에 LCE 총 자원량은 412.2만 톤입니다.
2시간 전
Review of the Iron Phosphate Market in H1 2024: Thorny Paths Are Also Scenic - Shanghai Metals Market (SMM)