Overseas Countries Taking More Controls Toward Lithium Resources

게시됨: Mar 30, 2023 16:29
출처: SMM
Recently, the long-lost "OPEC-like cartel for the lithium industry" concept has once again entered the sight of the lithium market with the speech of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Bolivia.

SHANGHAI, Market 30 (SMM) - Recently, the long-lost "OPEC-like cartel for the lithium industry" concept has once again entered the sight of the lithium market with the speech of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Bolivia. According to CCTV news reports, on March 24 local time, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Bolivia issued a message saying that it called on Latin American countries that produce lithium resources to respond to the Bolivian President's call and work together to accelerate the formation of the OPEC-like cartel for the lithium industry.

It is reported that Bolivian President Luis Arcein recently publicly criticized Bolivia and other Latin American countries for their policy of developing lithium mines through international cooperation, and decided to call on Chile, Argentina, Peru and other countries with large lithium reserves to join Bolivia to accelerate the establishment of an organisation of lithium producers led by Latin American countries.

In terms of lithium prices, taking Pilbara as an example, the auction prices of its spodumene rose by $6,255/mt, an increase of 500.4%.

According to SMM spot prices, the domestic average spot price of lithium carbonate was only around 53,000 yuan/mt at the beginning of 2021, but since entering 2022, the price skyrocketed by almost tenfold to as high as 567,500 yuan/mt. Therefore, in recent years, lithium, as a precious and scarce resource, has been increasingly valued by various countries.

In March 2021, the former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Argentina also took the initiative to discuss matters related to the OPEC-like cartel for the lithium industry with the Bolivian authorities. The idea of national power to regulate mineral resources was proposed, and discussions were rampant. Then, it was reported that the foreign ministers of Argentina, Bolivia and Chile were negotiating to reach a tripartite agreement on the production and commercialisation of lithium. And recently, Bolivia's president's call again seems to mean that the OPEC-like cartel for the lithium industry is getting closer.

The reason why the actions of the above-mentioned countries have attracted such a large amount of attention is inseparable from the rich lithium resources in their own countries. According to the US Geological Survey, as of 2021, the global lithium reserves are 22 million mt. Among them, Chile's lithium reserves are 9.2 million mt, accounting for 41.8%; Argentina's lithium reserves are 2.2 million mt, accounting for 10%. The lithium reserves of these two countries exceed 50%. In contrast, China's lithium reserves are only 1.5 million mt, accounting for 6.8%.

It is worth mentioning that, against the background of the increasing importance of lithium resources, the concept of establishing the Latin American "the OPEC-like cartel for the lithium industry" has even been supported by countries such as Mexico and Peru, both of which have abundant reserves of lithium resources.

Australia has long set limits to protect their own lithium resources

In addition to the above-mentioned countries, Australia also has considerable reserves of lithium resources. In 2022, the "the OPEC-like cartel for the lithium industry" of the three Bolivian countries also proposed the decision to absorb Australia, which also added more uncertainty to its future.

However, according to SMM, in recent years, the Australian government has imposed stricter restrictions on Chinese companies investing in lithium mining companies. Since the Australian government required all foreign investment in Australia to be reviewed by FIRB in 2019, it has blocked many investment projects involving Chinese companies.

Australia, on the other hand, implements a series of restrictions and laws on overseas companies investing in lithium mining enterprises, mainly to protect the country's national interests and the sustainability of resource development. On the basis of these restrictions and laws, the Australian government is also actively promoting the development of domestic enterprises in response to changes in the lithium mining market and challenges in the global economy.

In addition, Canada has also required three Chinese companies to divest their lithium mine assets in Canada on the grounds of national security since November 2022. However, in mid-March, Canada’s Minister of Natural Resources suddenly changed his mind and said that Canada would not force Chinese state-owned investors to divest their shares in the country’s three large mining companies due to concerns that policy uncertainty would dampen the confidence of future investors. It also mentioned that it will continue to trade with China, involving trade in key minerals.

Although the Canadian government's inconsistent approach seems to have loosened some control over lithium resources, in fact, according to the views of the Canadian mining industry, it seems that local mining companies had no choice but to cooperate with China due to the insufficient funds. It believes that lithium exploration is a long-term, high-risk investment. If Chinese capital is rejected, it will be difficult for Canadian mining companies, especially small and medium-sized mining companies, to attract funds.

Industry insiders also said that if Canada shuts out Chinese companies, it will not only cause financial losses, but also affect the export of mineral resources to China. If things go on like this, Canada’s long-term competitiveness in the mineral field may be affected.

On the whole, up to now, lithium has not only been included in the list of key mineral resources in resource countries such as Chile, Australia, Canada, and Congo (DRC), but also has attracted much attention in major new energy vehicle market in the United States, the European Union, and Japan.
 


데이터 출처 설명: 공개 정보를 제외한 모든 데이터는 SMM이 공개 정보, 시장 커뮤니케이션 및 SMM 내부 데이터베이스 모델을 기반으로 가공한 것입니다. 본 자료는 참고용이며 의사결정 권고를 구성하지 않습니다.

문의 사항이 있거나 자세한 정보를 원하시면 아래로 연락해 주시기 바랍니다: lemonzhao@smm.cn
리서치 보고서 열람 방법에 대한 자세한 내용은 아래로 문의하시기 바랍니다:service.en@smm.cn
관련 뉴스
SMM 데일리 리뷰: 9월 2일 탄산리튬 현물 가격 하락
12시간 전
SMM 데일리 리뷰: 9월 2일 탄산리튬 현물 가격 하락
더 보기
SMM 데일리 리뷰: 9월 2일 탄산리튬 현물 가격 하락
SMM 데일리 리뷰: 9월 2일 탄산리튬 현물 가격 하락
오늘 SMM 전지급 탄산리튬 현물 가격은 전 거래일 대비 소폭 하락했다. 탄산리튬 2701 계약은 오늘 157,000위안/톤에 낮게 개장한 후 하락세를 보였다. 오전 장중 156,000~157,000위안 구간에서 약세 흐름을 보였으며, 장중 고점은 157,800위안/톤이었다. 정오 무렵 153,200위안/톤까지 급락하며 장중 신저가를 기록했다. 정오 전후로 154,000~156,000위안 구간에서 등락을 반복했다. 오후 장에서는 매수 세력이 일시적으로 가격을 끌어올렸으나 평균 가격선을 돌파하지 못했다. 장 후반 다시 약세를 보이며 결국 3.2% 하락한 154,800위안/톤에 마감했고, 미결제약정은 9,123계약 감소했다. 현물 시장에서는 하류 업체들이 필요에 따라 저가 매수에 나섰다. 155,000위안/톤 이하에서는 하류의 현물 주문 매수 의향이 계속 회복되었다. 공급 측면에서는 가격이 하락함에 따라 현물 주문 판매 의향이 여전히 약했으며, 일부 리튬 화학 공장은 가격을 고수하며 판매를 보류했다. 전반적으로 시장 문의와 실제 거래는 비교적 활발했다.
12시간 전
8월 배터리급 황화리튬 생산 분석: 4분기에 급증할까? [SMM 분석]
13시간 전
8월 배터리급 황화리튬 생산 분석: 4분기에 급증할까? [SMM 분석]
더 보기
8월 배터리급 황화리튬 생산 분석: 4분기에 급증할까? [SMM 분석]
8월 배터리급 황화리튬 생산 분석: 4분기에 급증할까? [SMM 분석]
[SMM 분석: 8월 전지급 황화리튬 생산 분석, 4분기 급증할까?] 8월 중국 황화리튬 생산량은 7.79mt으로 전월 대비 3.6%, 전년 동기 대비 143% 증가했다. 4분기 황화리튬 생산량이 급증할까? 하류 수요로 볼 때 현재로서는 가능성이 비교적 낮지만 완만한 물량 확대는 지속될 것이다. 월평균 생산량은 9~10mt 수준에 도달할 것으로 예상되며, 3분기 대비 소폭 증가하는 수준이지 폭발적으로 급증하지는 않을 것이다.
13시간 전
[SMM 단신] Albemarle, Wodgina 스포듀민 정광 경매 완료... CIF 중국 기준 US$2,307/dmt
14시간 전
[SMM 단신] Albemarle, Wodgina 스포듀민 정광 경매 완료... CIF 중국 기준 US$2,307/dmt
더 보기
[SMM 단신] Albemarle, Wodgina 스포듀민 정광 경매 완료... CIF 중국 기준 US$2,307/dmt
[SMM 단신] Albemarle, Wodgina 스포듀민 정광 경매 완료... CIF 중국 기준 US$2,307/dmt
SMM 9월 2일: Albemarle는 오늘 자사 Wodgina 광산의 스포듀민 정광에 대한 새로운 입찰을 완료했습니다. 입찰 물량은 15,840건조톤이며, ±10%의 수량 허용 오차가 적용됩니다. 최종 거래 가격은 US$2,307/dmt CIF 중국으로 보고되었으며, Li₂O 6% 기준으로 표준화되었습니다. 화물 가격은 중국 전장항 CIF 기준이며, VAT는 제외됩니다. 결제 조건은 선불 현금 결제로, 9월 8일까지 대금 수령이 완료되어야 합니다.
14시간 전