Lithium Salt Prices: When will Roller-Coaster Ride End? When will Demand Pick Up?

Telah Terbit: Apr 6, 2023 12:03
Sumber: SMM
At present, the overall demand and prices of the lithium industry are going down, and the responses of each company vary. Traders that are standing on the sidelines will be more concerned about the rebound of lithium carbonate prices and the timing of downstream demand recovery. This article aims to answer the questions for various companies and traders like: Is there currently a reduction in overall production? Do lithium salt plants have profits? What is the proportion of losses? Will the demand of downstream car companies experience explosive growth in the second half of the year?

SHANGHAI, Apr 6 (SMM) - At present, the overall demand and prices of the lithium industry are going down, and the responses of each company vary. Traders that are standing on the sidelines will be more concerned about the rebound of lithium carbonate prices and the timing of downstream demand recovery. This article aims to answer the questions for various companies and traders like: Is there currently a reduction in overall production? Do lithium salt plants have profits? What is the proportion of losses? Will the demand of downstream car companies experience explosive growth in the second half of the year?

Lithium carbonate costs of various enterprises

While the actual cost of each enterprise is different, the industrial average cost is lowered by the companies extracting lithium from salt lake brine. The profits of companies producing lepidolite and integrated with lithium carbonate capacities are relatively high, and the profits of those producing spodumene are even higher. SMM data for Q1 2023 showed that

  1. The cost of battery-grade lithium carbonate produced from salt lake brine was 40,000-50,000 yuan/mt (including the purification cost from industrial-grade lithium carbonate carbon to battery-grade lithium carbonate);
  2. The production capacity of lithium carbonate produced by using self-produced raw spodumene was about 10,000-20,000 mt of LCE, and the cost was nearly 60,000 yuan/mt;
  3. The production capacity of lithium salt produced by self-produced lepidolite was 50,000-60,000 mt, corresponding to an average cost of 60,000-80,000 mt/mt;
  4. The production cost of lithium carbonate for enterprises purchasing lepidolite concentrate stood at around 200,000-250,000 yuan/mt. But as the price of raw ore went down, the cost also dropped The operating production capacity is about 50,000-60,000 mt of LCE;
  5. The production capacity of lithium carbonate using purchased spodumene concentrate is the highest and currently stands at some 100,000-130,000 mt. The cost is roughly between 300,000-320,000 yuan/mt based on the current price of spodumene concentrate. The decline in ore prices also drove down the lithium carbonate cost. Yet, the decline in ore prices in the first quarter was significantly lower than that of lithium carbonate. SMM statistics of the companies purchasing spodumene concentrate include the leading lithium salt factories with equity in overseas mines, which resulted in lower settlement price of spodumene concentrate and the production cost than the market average price.

Will the price of lithium carbonate fall to the break-even point of mainstream companies?

Lithium carbonate prices can hardly fall to the break-even point of mainstream companies as the cost will support prices in the long run. Basically, except for the enterprises that purchase spodumene concentrates and lepidolite concentrates, the production costs of other enterprises having their own resources are relatively low.

According to SMM data, on April 4, 2023, the prices of battery-grade lithium carbonate in China plummeted by 57% compared with the end of 2022, spodumene concentrate prices fell by 25%, phosphoperidite prices fell by 38%, and lepidolite concentrate prices plunged by 57%. At present, it is estimated that 25% to 30% of the domestic production capacity is in significant losses. This part of the loss-making capacity is mainly owned by lithium salt enterprises that purchase spodumene concentrate and lepidolite concentrate. Most of their raw materials are high-priced stocks. They would incur losses even as they produce with spot ore considering the production cycle and sales prices. Most of the loss-making enterprises using purchased lepidolite concentrate are located in Jiangxi, and those using purchased spodumene concentrate are mostly in Jiangxi and Sichuan.

Output cuts and halts by loss-making enterprises to directly impact cost support

There have been a few small lithium salt factories in China suspending production and large lithium salt factories cutting output, but the reduced production was relatively low compared with the current inventory of lithium salt factories. In 2023, the overall supply is expected to remain in excess. SMM currently expects an excess of about 30,000 mt of LCE. In 2022, lithium carbonate inventories fell 20,000-30,000 mt.

However, the lithium salt inventories of most CAM factories are currently at an extremely low level. After the market demand gradually picks up, the inventory of lithium salt factories can be quickly digested.

SMM understood that downstream buying interest has been low with low acceptable prices even as the costs of traders are high.  While sellers are expected to lower spodumene concentrate prices, the price drop can be much smaller than those of lithium salt.

Will prices continue to fall in the future?

In the absence of significant improvement in demand, supply has continued to grow. This is the main reason for the rapid decline in prices.

1. The main reason attributable to the current poor demand is that the production of new energy vehicle companies surged in the fourth quarter of last year, and the price cuts of fuel-powered vehicles will constrain the growth of new energy vehicles to a certain extent in the short term. Despite a growth in the overall sales, NEV inventories accumulated from January to February.

2. After the price of lithium carbonate fell, delivery taking of battery by automakers will slow down to varying degrees.  Delivery taking and purchases of CAM by battery factories as well as those of lithium salt by CAM plants will be deferred to reduce safe inventories. The market pessimism has magnified the decline in current demand in all links.

3. The silver lining is that the demand for the new energy vehicle industry typically improves significantly in the third and fourth quarter. Energy storage demand is expected to maintain a relatively high growth rate. Therefore, in anticipation of lithium carbonate stabilising due to cost support, the demand should gradually pick up. And the delivery taking of batteries by end-users will also gradually resume.


Pernyataan Sumber Data: Kecuali informasi yang tersedia untuk publik, semua data lainnya diproses oleh SMM berdasarkan informasi publik, komunikasi pasar, dan mengandalkan model database internal SMM. Hanya untuk referensi dan tidak menjadi rekomendasi pengambilan keputusan.

Untuk pertanyaan atau informasi lebih lanjut, silakan hubungi: lemonzhao@smm.cn
Untuk informasi lebih lanjut tentang cara mengakses laporan penelitian kami, hubungi:service.en@smm.cn
Berita Terkait
[SMM Kilat Kromium] Zimbabwe Menyita 1.500 ton Stok Konsentrat Krom dalam Penindakan Penyelundupan Mineral
8 jam yang lalu
[SMM Kilat Kromium] Zimbabwe Menyita 1.500 ton Stok Konsentrat Krom dalam Penindakan Penyelundupan Mineral
Baca Selengkapnya
[SMM Kilat Kromium] Zimbabwe Menyita 1.500 ton Stok Konsentrat Krom dalam Penindakan Penyelundupan Mineral
[SMM Kilat Kromium] Zimbabwe Menyita 1.500 ton Stok Konsentrat Krom dalam Penindakan Penyelundupan Mineral
Badan Pemasaran Mineral Zimbabwe (MMCZ) mencatat 18 kasus dugaan penyelundupan mineral dan pergerakan mineral tidak teratur antara Januari hingga 20 Agustus 2026, mencakup total 2.654,88 ton material mineral dan besi tua. Litium, krom, dan silika mendominasi daftar kasus, menurut Pembaruan Pasar Akuntansi dan Pengawasan Sumber Daya Mineral perdana MMCZ. Item terbesar adalah tumpukan konsentrat krom seberat 1.500 ton di Darwendale, yang ditempatkan di bawah embargo sambil investigasi berlanjut, mencakup lebih dari separuh total tonase yang ditandai selama periode peninjauan. Kasus-kasus lainnya mencakup 1.154,88 ton. Manajer Umum MMCZ Dr. Nomusa Jane Moyo mengatakan pelanggaran yang terdeteksi meliputi pergerakan tanpa dokumen yang sah, penyalahgunaan atau pemalsuan dokumen ekspor, kesalahan deklarasi kargo, dan upaya pergerakan bijih mineral yang belum diolah. Mineral kritis telah menjadi fokus khusus upaya pengawasan korporasi, sejalan dengan kebijakan pemerintah tentang pengolahan nilai tambah dan kontrol yang lebih ketat terhadap ekspor mineral mentah. Sebagian besar kasus tercatat di titik perbatasan, mencerminkan penempatan Inspektorat Akuntansi Sumber Daya Mineral permanen di pos perbatasan, kemampuan yang sebelumnya tidak dimiliki MMCZ, dengan inspektur kini memverifikasi kargo secara fisik, memeriksa kiriman, dan mengumpulkan sampel jika konfirmasi teknis diperlukan. Penegakan hukum semakin dipandu oleh intelijen, mengandalkan kerja sama antara MMCZ dan Unit Mineral, Flora, dan Fauna Departemen Investigasi Kriminal Zimbabwe, intelijen kepolisian, Otoritas Pendapatan Zimbabwe, dan Komisi Anti-Korupsi Zimbabwe. Hasil yang tercatat selama periode tersebut meliputi penangkapan, persidangan di pengadilan, denda, penyitaan bijih mineral untuk negara, penahanan kiriman, dan pengembalian mineral tanpa dokumen ke sumbernya. Dr. Moyo mengatakan korporasi mempertahankan pendekatan tanpa toleransi terhadap ekspor mineral ilegal dan akan terus memperketat rezim pengawasannya melalui inspeksi perbatasan, pemantauan tingkat tambang, pengambilan sampel, dan operasi penegakan gabungan, dengan tujuan memastikan Zimbabwe dapat mempertanggungjawabkan sumber daya mineralnya dari sumber hingga pasar sesuai dengan kebijakan pengolahan nilai tambah nasional.
8 jam yang lalu
[SMM Kilasan Kromium] Tarif Kerja Paksa AS Menghantam Ferrokrom Afrika Selatan Tanpa Pengecualian Pasal 232
8 jam yang lalu
[SMM Kilasan Kromium] Tarif Kerja Paksa AS Menghantam Ferrokrom Afrika Selatan Tanpa Pengecualian Pasal 232
Baca Selengkapnya
[SMM Kilasan Kromium] Tarif Kerja Paksa AS Menghantam Ferrokrom Afrika Selatan Tanpa Pengecualian Pasal 232
[SMM Kilasan Kromium] Tarif Kerja Paksa AS Menghantam Ferrokrom Afrika Selatan Tanpa Pengecualian Pasal 232
Tarif kerja paksa AS sebesar 12,5% atas barang-barang Afrika Selatan mulai berlaku pada 24 Juli 2026, dan tidak seperti produk baja jadi, ferokrom tidak mendapat pengecualian dari pungutan tersebut. Baja jadi memperoleh pengecualian yang terkait dengan bea baja Pasal 232 yang sudah ada, tetapi ferokrom, yang diklasifikasikan sebagai input paduan dan bukan barang baja jadi, tidak pernah tercakup dalam program itu, sehingga sepenuhnya terpapar tarif baru tersebut. Paparan ini memiliki bobot yang sangat besar mengingat skala ketergantungan AS pada pasokan Afrika Selatan. Afrika Selatan memasok 96% bijih kromit yang diimpor ke Amerika Serikat dan tetap menjadi sumber tunggal terbesar ferokrom jadi untuk pasar AS, sementara negara itu menambang hampir 45% dari produksi bijih kromit dunia. Menurut Ringkasan Komoditas Mineral Februari 2026 dari Survei Geologi AS, AS sama sekali tidak memiliki produksi tambang kromit domestik dan memiliki ketergantungan impor bersih kromium sebesar 79%, dengan skrap baja tahan karat daur ulang menutupi sisanya. Dalam tulisannya di Business Day, penasihat sektor ferokrom Millard Arnold, mantan wakil asisten menteri luar negeri AS dan mantan konselor menteri untuk urusan komersial di kedutaan AS di Afrika Selatan, berpendapat bahwa sebagian besar ferokrom masih masuk ke AS melalui pasar spot, bukan melalui perjanjian offtake jangka panjang yang terstruktur, berbeda dengan Tiongkok yang menurutnya telah mengunci pengaturan pasokan jangka panjang dengan produsen Afrika Selatan untuk memasok industri bajanya sendiri. Arnold menyerukan Washington untuk memperlakukan ferokrom dengan urgensi strategis yang sama seperti yang diterapkan pada logam tanah jarang, menunjuk pada kesepakatan offtake yang didukung pembiayaan pembangunan dan preseden seperti Judul III Undang-Undang Produksi Pertahanan AS, yang menetapkan Inggris dan Australia sebagai sumber mineral kritis yang memenuhi syarat, sebagai model yang dapat diperluas Washington ke Afrika Selatan. Apakah para pembuat kebijakan AS akan menindaklanjuti argumen tersebut, alih-alih membiarkan tarif baru itu berlaku tanpa penanganan, tetap menjadi pertanyaan terbuka yang akan menentukan seberapa besar perdagangan ferokrom Afrika Selatan terus bergeser ke Tiongkok untuk sementara waktu.
8 jam yang lalu
Harga Magnesium Naik Tiga Sesi Berturut-turut! Sisi Biaya Tetap "Membara" Sementara Sisi Permintaan Kesulitan Mengambil Alih [Komentar SMM]
9 jam yang lalu
Harga Magnesium Naik Tiga Sesi Berturut-turut! Sisi Biaya Tetap "Membara" Sementara Sisi Permintaan Kesulitan Mengambil Alih [Komentar SMM]
Baca Selengkapnya
Harga Magnesium Naik Tiga Sesi Berturut-turut! Sisi Biaya Tetap "Membara" Sementara Sisi Permintaan Kesulitan Mengambil Alih [Komentar SMM]
Harga Magnesium Naik Tiga Sesi Berturut-turut! Sisi Biaya Tetap "Membara" Sementara Sisi Permintaan Kesulitan Mengambil Alih [Komentar SMM]
9 jam yang lalu