EU Clarifies How the “Melt and Pour Country” Must Be Proven
On August 31, the EU published Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1963 in the Official Journal, setting out detailed requirements for proving the “melt and pour country” of imported steel products. The regulation was adopted on August 28 and will apply from October 1, 2026.
For the stainless steel market, the immediate impact of the new rules is expected to be concentrated on documentation, heat-number traceability and supply-chain information management.
The longer-term implications, however, may extend beyond compliance costs.
Under the current EU framework, the melt and pour requirement will be incorporated into steel import management in several stages.
From October 2026, importers will first be required to declare and substantiate melt and pour information. From October 2027, the European Commission will begin taking the information collected into account when determining country-specific tariff-rate quota allocations. By June 30, 2028, the Commission is also required to assess whether the melt and pour country should itself become a basis for access to tariff quotas.
This means that trade routes involving further processing in a third country before export to Europe could eventually face greater scrutiny over the original location of steel production.
From “Where Was It Exported From?” to “Where Was the Steel First Made?”
The concept of “melt and pour” does not refer to where a steel product was finally cold rolled, slit or processed.
Instead, it identifies where the original iron or steel was first produced in liquid form in a steelmaking or ironmaking furnace and subsequently cast into its first solid form.
The definition also covers the remelting of scrap.
The first solid form may include a slab, billet or ingot, or, depending on the production process, a directly produced finished steel product.
For example, if stainless steel is melted and continuously cast in Country A, then exported to Country B for cold rolling, annealing, pickling or other downstream processing before being shipped to the EU, its melt and pour country would in principle remain Country A.
Further processing in Country B does not change where the steel was originally melted and poured.
It is important, however, to distinguish the melt and pour country from the conventional customs origin of a product. The two concepts are not necessarily the same.
The new requirement therefore adds another layer of supply-chain identification: where the original steel was actually made.
This is particularly relevant to Asia’s stainless steel supply chain, where cross-border processing has become increasingly common.
In addition to direct exports of finished stainless steel, hot-rolled products and other intermediate materials are frequently shipped to another country or region for further processing before reaching end markets such as Europe.
Under the melt and pour framework, the EU will increasingly be able to look beyond the final processing location and identify the original source of the steel.
What Documentation Will Be Required From October 1?
From October 1, 2026, EU importers will generally be required to provide a Mill Test Certificate (MTC).
The certificate must contain two key pieces of information:
the melt and pour country and the corresponding heat number.
Where an MTC exists but does not contain all the required information, supplementary documentation may be used.
This can include invoices, delivery notes, quality certificates, purchase orders or contracts, long-term supplier declarations, production and cost documentation, customs documents from the exporting country, commercial correspondence and descriptions of the production process.
The EU has also established a one-year transitional period.
Between October 1, 2026 and September 30, 2027, where an MTC is unavailable, other eligible documents may serve as standalone evidence provided that they contain or substantiate both the melt and pour country and the relevant heat number.
From October 1, 2027, this standalone alternative will end.
An MTC will then become the principal document, while other records may still be used to supplement missing information in the certificate.
October 1 therefore does not mean that stainless steel without a fully standardised melt and pour declaration will immediately be unable to enter the EU.
The transitional period gives importers, producers and suppliers time to adjust existing documentation and supply-chain management systems.
However, the requirements should not be regarded as merely administrative.
Where supporting documentation other than an MTC is used, customs authorities are required to perform documentary checks, which may increase the time required for customs clearance.
Where the melt and pour country cannot be declared or supported by appropriate and verifiable evidence, the import may be rejected.
Near-Term Impact: Traceability Before Trade Volumes
The implementing regulation itself does not further change the existing tariff-rate quota volumes or the current out-of-quota tariff level.
As a result, the immediate impact on the stainless steel market is more likely to be seen in trade procedures than in a sudden change in supply and demand.
For integrated stainless steel mills with their own steelmaking, casting and rolling operations, heat numbers, production records and quality certificates are generally already part of routine production management.
Adding melt and pour information may therefore be relatively manageable.
The situation could be more complicated for material passing through several traders, service centres or cross-border processing stages.
A single stainless steel coil may move through hot rolling, cold rolling, slitting, warehousing, resale and further processing before eventually reaching the EU.
Under the new rules, information on the original heat number and melt location will need to continue through the supply chain and remain traceable to the specific product being imported into Europe.
As a result, traders, processing centres and producers using imported hot-rolled feedstock may need to make greater adjustments to procurement procedures, contracts, MTC management and inventory systems than large integrated mills.
The longer and more fragmented the supply chain, the more difficult it may become to preserve full traceability to the original melt.
Third-Country Processing Is the More Important Longer-Term Issue
For the stainless steel market, the more significant question is not the immediate cost of additional documentation, but how the EU may ultimately use the information it collects.
At present, the melt and pour requirement primarily serves a transparency and supply-chain traceability function.
Steel melted in a particular country will not automatically lose access to tariff quotas from October 1, 2026 simply because of its melt and pour country.
However, the EU has already established clear next steps.
From October 1, 2027, the European Commission is required to take melt and pour information into account when setting country-specific tariff-rate quota allocations.
By June 30, 2028, the Commission must further assess whether the melt and pour country should directly become a basis for access to tariff quotas.
The EU has stated that this assessment is intended, among other objectives, to prevent steel produced in third countries contributing to global excess capacity from entering the European market after further processing in another third country.
This means that the melt and pour system is more than a documentary reform.
From October 2026, the EU will begin building a more detailed dataset on the actual production origin of imported steel.
From October 2027, that information will begin to feed into quota allocation considerations.
If it is later linked directly to tariff-quota eligibility, the commercial significance of melt and pour information could increase substantially.
One trade route that therefore deserves particular attention is:
steel melted and hot rolled in one country, further processed in another country, and then exported to Europe as a product originating from the processing country.
Under the current rules, this trade route is not prohibited, nor does the new regulation automatically change the product’s conventional customs origin.
But if melt and pour information is eventually linked more directly to quota eligibility, the economics of such cross-border processing models could change.
For China, Indonesia and other major stainless steel production and processing centres in Asia, future analysis will therefore need to look beyond direct exports to Europe and also examine cross-border flows of stainless steel semis and hot-rolled feedstock.
Stainless Steel Is Already Covered by the New EU Steel Framework
The melt and pour requirement forms part of the EU’s broader 2026 steel import framework.
Stainless steel products covered by the system include stainless hot-rolled sheets and strips, cold-rolled sheets and strips, hot-rolled quarto plates, stainless bars and light sections, stainless wire rod and certain stainless steel tubes and pipes.
The annual tariff-rate quotas include:
- Stainless hot-rolled sheets and strips: 153,186 tonnes
- Stainless cold-rolled sheets and strips: 496,342 tonnes
- Stainless hot-rolled quarto plates: 17,025 tonnes
- Stainless bars and light sections: 133,595 tonnes
- Stainless wire rod: 40,462 tonnes
- Seamless stainless steel tubes and pipes: 32,967 tonnes
Imports exceeding the applicable quota, or imports not eligible for quota treatment, are in principle subject to a 50% ad valorem out-of-quota tariff, in addition to other duties that may apply.
For stainless steel exporters, access to the European market will therefore increasingly involve two separate considerations.
The first is how much material can enter under the relevant tariff quota.
The second is whether the original melt and pour country can be clearly identified and verified.
As the melt and pour requirement takes effect, EU steel trade policy is moving beyond the question of where a product is exported from and increasingly towards where the steel itself was originally produced.
SMM View: Limited Immediate Impact, but Trade Routes May Matter More Over Time
SMM expects the direct impact of the melt and pour rules on the Asian stainless steel market from October 1 to remain relatively limited.
The implementing regulation itself does not further alter the existing tariff-rate quota volumes or the 50% out-of-quota tariff, nor does it immediately exclude stainless steel melted in any particular country from tariff-quota access.
The one-year documentary transition period also reduces the immediate pressure on companies to overhaul their MTC and supply-chain documentation systems.
Near-term impacts are therefore expected to be concentrated on compliance costs, heat-number traceability, information transmission and customs-clearance efficiency.
The longer-term implications, however, deserve closer attention.
The EU’s melt and pour framework follows a clear sequence:
information collection and verification from October 2026; consideration of melt and pour data in country-specific quota allocation from October 2027; and an assessment by 2028 of whether the melt and pour country should directly determine access to tariff quotas.
If tariff-rate quotas determine how much steel can enter Europe under quota treatment, and the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) changes the carbon cost of imported steel, then the melt and pour framework increasingly answers another question: where was the steel actually produced?
Taken together, these mechanisms are extending EU steel trade regulation beyond traditional tariffs and customs origin towards a broader system covering import volumes, carbon emissions and original steelmaking location.
For Asia’s stainless steel supply chain, the main issue is therefore not whether trade will suddenly stop after October 1.
The more important question is whether, as melt and pour data becomes increasingly integrated into the EU quota system, some existing cross-border processing and re-export routes will need to be reassessed.
In this sense, October 1, 2026 marks the beginning of the EU’s melt and pour framework rather than its final form.
![[Análisis SMM] La disposición de compra de los compradores chinos se fortaleció; los cambios en el mercado de exportación de sulfato de níquel de Corea del Sur fueron dignos de destacar.](https://imgqn.smm.cn/usercenter/qLeLR20251217171733.jpg)
![[Análisis SMM] El interés de compra chino se fortalece, atrayendo atención a los cambios en el mercado de exportación de sulfato de níquel de Corea](https://imgqn.smm.cn/usercenter/LNpBh20251217171732.jpeg)
