In August 2026, the lithium battery industry chain entered the pre-stocking cycle for the September-October peak season. Demand from both the power battery and energy storage sectors continued to be released, driving a steady rise in electrolyte industry operating rates and production. The industry as a whole continued to see ample nominal capacity for finished electrolyte but tight supply of core raw materials such as LiPF6 and VC, creating a structural pattern. Upstream lithium chemicals and additive prices rose, pushing up finished electrolyte prices, though this had not yet been fully passed through to downstream clients. Future price trends still need continuous tracking of raw material price changes and the pass-through situation.
This month, LiPF6 prices drifted higher. Downstream, as power battery and energy storage stockpiling progressed, market demand rose steadily. On the supply side, the industry’s overall operating rate was already at a relatively high level, with most producers’ plants running at full capacity. Although a few enterprises still had some idle capacity, their willingness to quickly release additional supply was weak due to production debugging and cost-benefit considerations, and production-side players preferred to hold prices firm and push prices up. Overall, supply elasticity was insufficient, spot circulating supply tightened, and the supply-demand pattern became tighter. Against this backdrop, producers had ample confidence to hold prices firm and raised market offer prices successively, further driving LiPF6 spot prices higher.
Additive segment, the tight spot supply in the VC market persisted, and prices stayed high. Due to their hazardous chemical properties, the approval, construction, and ramp-up cycle for new VC capacity was relatively long. In the short term, only limited effective new supply was released, the tight supply-demand pattern was difficult to ease, and market expectations for price hikes were strong. FEC followed suit and stayed high. The rise in VC prices directly pushed up overall electrolyte production costs, and pressure within the electrolyte industry diverged significantly: leading electrolyte enterprises with captive VC capacity or raw materials locked in through long-term contracts faced manageable pressure, while small and medium-sized electrolyte enterprises without captive supporting capacity and dependent on spot procurement saw significantly greater cost pressure.
Solvent side, earlier Middle East geopolitical conflicts pushed up crude oil prices, and solvent costs rose accordingly. Since solvents themselves were near the break-even line, cost pressure was difficult to absorb internally and could only be passed downstream, so offer prices rose somewhat.
Finished electrolyte side, downstream power battery cell enterprises gradually began peak-season stockpiling, and energy storage sector demand remained highly prosperous, driving battery cell enterprises’ production schedules up MoM. Electrolyte producers generally adopted a produce-based-on-sales strategy, and industry operating rates rose in tandem with downstream orders. However, the technical barrier in finished electrolyte blending was relatively low. A large amount of newly built and expanded capacity came on stream in the earlier period, leaving the industry’s nominal total capacity significantly higher than actual market demand. The competitive landscape of the finished product market was relatively fierce, which suppressed the room for price increases on the finished product side to some extent. Although the rise in LiPF6, VC, and solvent prices significantly raised overall electrolyte costs, there was a certain time lag in cost pass-through to battery cell enterprises. At present, electrolyte prices only showed a slight tentative uptrend, and future price trends would still depend on further downstream pass-through of upstream costs.
Note: If you have any additions or corrections regarding the details mentioned in this article, please feel free to contact us. Contact information is as follows:
Tel: 021-20707858 Hu Xuejie, thank you!
SMM New Energy Research Team
Wang Cong 021-51666838
Ma Rui 021-51595780
Feng Disheng 021-51666714
Lyu Yanlin 021-20707875
Zhang Haohan 021-51666752
Wang Zihan 021-51666914
Wang Jie 021-51595902
Xu Yang 021-51666760
Xu Mengqi 021-20707868
Hu Xuejie 021-20707858
![Cobalt Product Prices Remained in the Doldrums, with the Center of Cobalt Sulphate Continuing to Move Lower; the Market Awaited the Performance of the September-October Peak Season [Weekly Review]](https://imgqn.smm.cn/usercenter/PBUeR20251217171730.jpg)
